Category talk:Disambiguation: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(the most widely disregarded rule in page creation?)
Line 7: Line 7:


A disambig page for two articles may be necessary if both topics are of relatively equal importance.  -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
A disambig page for two articles may be necessary if both topics are of relatively equal importance.  -- [[User: Son of Suns|Son of Suns]]
Current policy is a [[MarioWiki:Naming#Shared titles|minimum of four pages]] as [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive/70#Lower_the_requirement_for_a_disambiguation_page_from_5_to_4|per proposal]]. Yet randomly sampling through the category shows that the majority fails to reach that requirement. It might be the mostly widely disregarded rule in this wiki. This rule might as well not exist.--[[User:Platform|Platform]] ([[User talk:Platform|talk]]) 04:54, February 5, 2025 (EST)

Revision as of 04:55, February 5, 2025

Should we create disambiguation pages that only link to two pages? Seems a bit minor to me.Knife (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2007 (EDT)

We already have some of those, and I think we shouldn't have them... ~Uniju(T-C-E)

I agree, the articleabout template works best if its only two pages. -- Sir Grodus

I Agree although the peekaboo page should stay..Mario riding YoshiXzelionETC

A disambig page for two articles may be necessary if both topics are of relatively equal importance. -- Son of Suns

Current policy is a minimum of four pages as per proposal. Yet randomly sampling through the category shows that the majority fails to reach that requirement. It might be the mostly widely disregarded rule in this wiki. This rule might as well not exist.--Platform (talk) 04:54, February 5, 2025 (EST)