MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Mario Kart 7: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 14: Line 14:


==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
==== Removal of support/oppose votes ====
'''Tails777'''
#{{User|Time Turner}} "currently being worked on" is definitely not the same as "is in working condition '''now'''", and until everything about the article is actually worthy of being featured, there's no reason for it to remained featured. Let's not be hasty.


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
I have started by adding a section for standard gameplay and features and giving the Pre-Released content header a section of info. I plan to go about removing broken references and there in lies my question: is it fine to just removed them since the game has been out for 6 years now or do we still need references for some of these points? {{User:Tails777/sig}}
I have started by adding a section for standard gameplay and features and giving the Pre-Released content header a section of info. I plan to go about removing broken references and there in lies my question: is it fine to just removed them since the game has been out for 6 years now or do we still need references for some of these points? {{User:Tails777/sig}}

Revision as of 19:16, October 2, 2017

Mario Kart 7

Remove featured article status

  1. Time Turner (talk) The intro is suprisingly bereft of information despite being so wordy (it's a part of the Mario Kart series and it has new stuff, but what is this game?), the gameplay doesn't once talk about the game's standard gameplay beyond the new stuff, every non-racer is bunched together into an unhelpfully undetailed section, the Pre-release and unused content is an empty section, and the Staff really seems like it could be expanded with more context. Also, several of the references are broken, enough that it's cause for concern.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk) Per Time Turner.
  3. TheFlameChomp (talk) Per Time Turner.

Keep featured article status

  1. Tails777 (talk) Aside from the non-playable characters and the opening paragraph (both of which I'm working on), I have addressed the problems listed. If there's anything else or the areas still need improving, let me know. Other than that, I find the article is still perfectly fine to be featured.

Removal of support/oppose votes

Tails777

  1. Time Turner (talk) "currently being worked on" is definitely not the same as "is in working condition now", and until everything about the article is actually worthy of being featured, there's no reason for it to remained featured. Let's not be hasty.

Comments

I have started by adding a section for standard gameplay and features and giving the Pre-Released content header a section of info. I plan to go about removing broken references and there in lies my question: is it fine to just removed them since the game has been out for 6 years now or do we still need references for some of these points? Sprite of Yoshi's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate Tails777 Talk to me!Sprite of Daisy's stock icon from Super Smash Bros. Ultimate