User talk:Camwoodstock: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
Time Turner (talk | contribs) (→Shiny enemies: new section) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Will certainly take a look at including Skillit in a future edition, thanks for the suggestion. As for the Oxford comma, do you have a forum account? If you do, then I'd suggest starting a discussion [https://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=29237.0 here]. If not, just let me know, and I'll start it for you. {{User|Yoshi876}} | Will certainly take a look at including Skillit in a future edition, thanks for the suggestion. As for the Oxford comma, do you have a forum account? If you do, then I'd suggest starting a discussion [https://www.marioboards.com/index.php?topic=29237.0 here]. If not, just let me know, and I'll start it for you. {{User|Yoshi876}} | ||
:No worries, I'll start a discussion soon for you. {{User|Yoshi876}} | :No worries, I'll start a discussion soon for you. {{User|Yoshi876}} | ||
== Shiny enemies == | |||
In regards to [[MarioWiki:Proposals#What_to_do_about_Paper_Jam_Shiny_articles|this proposal]], may I ask why you support giving the paper enemies separate articles but not the shiny enemies? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 17:58, 15 September 2017 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:58, September 15, 2017
Ha ha! I chose 777 because is is both the number of God and considered 'lucky'. Hey, if you need simple help, I may be able to help you. But you may be better off contacting an administrator or bureaucrat. 
DarkBowser777(talk)
20:25, 13 August 2017 (EDT)
RE: Trivia
It's not that trivia is outlawed on the wiki, it's just where possible we do try to incorporate trivia into the main body of the article. I do apologise if my summary came off bad or rude towards you. Personally, I felt the Super Mario RPG part fitted well in the intro, hence why I thought it should stay there. But in all honesty, the second point probably is better of as a trivia point. Yoshi876 (talk)
RE: Spotlight
Will certainly take a look at including Skillit in a future edition, thanks for the suggestion. As for the Oxford comma, do you have a forum account? If you do, then I'd suggest starting a discussion here. If not, just let me know, and I'll start it for you. Yoshi876 (talk)
Shiny enemies
In regards to this proposal, may I ask why you support giving the paper enemies separate articles but not the shiny enemies? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 17:58, 15 September 2017 (EDT)
