MarioWiki:Proposals

Proposals can be new features (such as an extension), removal of a previously added feature that has tired out, or new policies that must be approved via consensus before any action(s) are done. Any user can support or oppose, but must have a strong reason for doing so, not, e.g., "I like this idea!" "Vote" periods last for one week. Any past proposals are archived. A proposal section works like a discussion page: comments are brought up and replied to using indents (colons, such as : or ::::) and all edits are signed with the signature code ~~~(~). How To Actions that sysops or users feel are appropriate to have community approval first can be added by anyone, but they must have a strong argument. Users then vote and discuss on the issue during that week. The "deadline" for the proposal is one week from posting at: Monday to Thursday: 17:00 (5pm) Friday and Saturday: 20:00 (8pm) Sunday: 15:00 (3pm) At any time a vote may be rejected if at least three active users believe the vote truly has strong reasons supporting it. Every vote should have a reason accompanying it. "# " should be added under the last vote of each support/oppose section to show another blank line. At the deadline, the validity of each vote and the discussion is reviewed by the community. A sysop or user calls the result of the proposal and takes action(s) as decided if necessary, and archives the proposal. The times are in EDT, and are set so that the user is more likely to be online at those times (after school, weekend nights). So for example, if a proposal is added on Saturday night at 11:59 PM EDT, the deadline is the next Saturday night at 8:00 PM. If it is indeed a minute later, the deadline is a day plus 15 hours (Sunday), as opposed to a day minus 4 hours. CURRENTLY: 16:56, 31 January 2025 (EDT) New Features Featured Images There is already the {{Featured-image}}, we should use it. The system will be exactly like the original FA system. Proposer:Plumber 14:19, 12 August 2007 (EDT) Due Date: 17:00, August 19 Support Plumber 14:19, 12 August 2007 (EDT) It's about time we got a new project and put that template to use. Seems Like an excellent Idea too me, unlike those anger management classes I got twice Walkazo (and Pantaro Paratroopa) This message was PP's. Stumpers! Compitition is fine. I mean... we got rid of the FA already, and everyone's just sitting around sorta and being confused at the new system. Ugh... it's so... EXTENSIVE!!! Agh! Oppose "Could create Competition" ~Wayoshi Like, everywhere --- Max2 (talk) Wa TC@Y – no need to assess images. The template is used to give a current FA an illustration on the Main Page, that's all. Max2: I'm not so worried about competition for people finding better images, I just think we're not big enough to sustain a steady supply of spectacular images. Many that are uploaded are quite small. Comments Removals Trouble Center Face it, folks. The Trouble Center has been rarely used in 2007 after an initial burst, I don't think at all this summer. It's meant for newbies or the experienced to get article help where they cannot, such as knowledge of classic or obscure games. But, both of these kinds of members have fallen through: very few newbs become full members here and usually ask a veteran instead or don't have any questions for article content; veterans work at what they are strongest OR are more involved in sub-communities such as Fantendo or Userpedia instead. Our community is just not big enough to sustain the ideal function that was set last year. Oh well, but we would survive. Proposer: Wa TC@Y Deadline: 17:00, 23 August Drop It Wa TC@Y – community size too small to reach ideal goal, thus it has fallen through like a dead weight. Try a Comeback Comments Changes Moving Koopa Paratroopa The flying Koopas are currently under the article name of "Koopa Paratroopa", their official name from Super Mario Bros. However, I believe that we should use a name from more recent games, such as Paratroopa or Parakoopa as the article name. Proposer: Cobold (talk · contribs) 09:16, 10 August 2007 (EDT) Due Date: August 17th, 20:00 EDT Move to Paratroopa Cobold (talk · contribs) - It's their most-commonly used name. XzelionETC - Per Cobold Move to Parakoopa Leave at Koopa Paratroopa User: Walkazo Changing it to Parakoopa could be just as silly as changing Pink boo, the name used in several games, to Red Boo, the name used in Mario Party 8. Phoenix Rider It sounds more official this way. Stumpers! It's the full name. The fact that the abbreviation has been used in its place in later games really doesn't mean that the name has been changed. I would say that something like this would only be applicable in the case of Bloober's name change to Blooper. Plumber per Stumpers Comments Parakoopa should still be a redirect, at least. Max2 (talk) Of course. Just like Peach should redirect to Princess Peach, etc. Stumpers! And Mario should redirect to "Mario Mario"? XzelionETC I don't think so: that was his name only in other media. Rather, I would put Mario Mario as a redirect to Mario. Here's the thing: they're called the Mario Bros., but that doesn't mean their last names are Mario. It's just an assumption we've made based off of information from the Real World. Who knows how it works in the Mushroom Kingdom? Besides, remember how Wario and Waluigi are called Wicked Bros.? Perhaps the ___ Bros. thing doesn't even signify brotherhood. Stumpers! In Yoshi Island they are brothers as they were delivered to the SAME Parents User:Walkazo I wasn't saying they aren't brothers. Simply that relying on the whole ___ Bros. concept to work as it would in our world isn't trustworthy, though, you see? All I'm saying is that we don't know their last names. Stumpers! 13:42, 11 August 2007 (EDT) Splits One of the most common proposals, related to splitting one article into multiple ones. Merges Merging Wario Treasures From with Grodus said on the template talk page, I'd like to add a bit more. First off all the articles state are: Number of the Treasure Description Retail Value Episode All which would be covered in the table, this would very much be like the Badges page. Any thoughts comments? Proposer: XzelionETC (started by Sir Grodus (talk)) Due Date: August 17th, 20:00 EDT Merge XzelionETC - Per Above Gofer Theyy are too minor to warrant an article. Wa TC@Y – there's 130, right? And they each have the same info? Sounds like a job for a table page. Cobold (talk · contribs) - Too minor objects, and too many of them. Knife (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2007 (EDT) too many orphaned pages appearing. Plumber Per Cobold. Stumpers! I find it ironic that my support was deemed "unsupported" by someone who writes "per so-and-so" after all of his posts. Please don't get rid of my vote. All I said was that we should do this only if we have a way to link readers to the part of the page where the item is, and not just to the top of the page. Here, I'll through in some good, hard boiled support. "Too many pages is nasty." Yay... it's been said before! Keep Separate Comments Also all of these show up on the Orphan Pages. XzelionETC Because of a bug. Plumber 14:21, 12 August 2007 (EDT) No actually I linked them to the MOD article and they're all gone :P XzelionETC Miscellaneous None currently