Template talk:FA archive notice: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 51: Line 51:
===Support Option 2===
===Support Option 2===
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} per proposal; this is my preferred option
#{{User|Supermariofan67}} per proposal; this is my preferred option
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} For the sake of professionalism, this is my preferred option as well. Considering [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 44#Create a template for proposal outcomes|the]] [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 46#Expand the "Outcome template" rule to appeal outcomes|many]] [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 46#Create .7B{TPPDiscuss}.7D|many]] proposals we've had about creating templates to make things easier, this proposal brings up a point as valid as the ones I mentioned. <small>Also, if anything, I feel this template should be split to differentiate between featuring and unfeaturing nominations.</small>
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} For the sake of professionalism, this is my preferred option as well. Considering [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 44#Create a template for proposal outcomes|the]] [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 46#Expand the "Outcome template" rule to appeal outcomes|many]] [[MarioWiki:Proposals/Archive 46#Create %7B%7BTPPDiscuss%7D%7D|proposals]] we've had about creating templates to make things easier, this proposal brings up a point as valid as the ones I mentioned. <small>Also, if anything, I feel this template should be split to differentiate between featuring and unfeaturing nominations.</small>


===Oppose===
===Oppose===


===Comments===
===Comments===

Revision as of 21:43, April 22, 2017

Automatically add the sentence below the box?

A Yellow Block from Super Mario World This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment.

Current time: Thursday, April 3, 2025, 04:19 GMT

In the instructions for archiving nominations, it says to add <article> was nominated for featured article/to be unfeatured at <nominated> and passed at <whenpassed>. We could add this (and the categories) automatically with this template. It would use the parameters already in {{FANOMSTAT}}:

Option 1

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png
This is an archive of a successful featured article article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.

FA archive notice was nominated to be a featured article at {{{nominated}}} and passed at Error: Invalid time.
Instructions:
|nominated - the date and time the article was nominated
|passed - the date and time the article met 5-0 status (featuring time will automatically be calculated)
|unfeature=yes - add this parameter if it is an unfeature nomination


Option 2

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
FA archive notice was nominated to be a featured article at {{{nominated}}} and passed at Error: Invalid time.


Instructions:
|nominated - the date and time the article was nominated
|passed - the date and time the article met 5-0 status (featuring time will automatically be calculated)
|unfeature=yes - add this parameter if it is an unfeature nomination


Proposer: Supermariofan67 (talk)
Deadline: May 6, 2017, 23:59 GMT

Support Option 1

  1. Supermariofan67 (talk) per proposal

Support Option 2

  1. Supermariofan67 (talk) per proposal; this is my preferred option
  2. Toadette the Achiever (talk) For the sake of professionalism, this is my preferred option as well. Considering the many proposals we've had about creating templates to make things easier, this proposal brings up a point as valid as the ones I mentioned. Also, if anything, I feel this template should be split to differentiate between featuring and unfeaturing nominations.

Oppose

Comments