MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Kiddy Kong: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(It has broke rule 5 since August) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==== Remove featured article status ==== | ==== Remove featured article status ==== | ||
#{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} Back in 2011, this page was put up to be unfeatured. It failed, but now I think it is time to have it unfeatured. I found this article while looking at the upcoming FA. I went to look at it, and found that it has a rewrite template on it. This was put on by a patroller who knows that feature articles aren't suppose to have these marks. It has been since August of this year since the rewrite has been placed. There may be more to this article that falls under FA requirements, but this is extremely noticeable. Summary: This can't be a FA according to the one of the rules. | #{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} Back in 2011, this page was put up to be unfeatured. It failed, but now I think it is time to have it unfeatured. I found this article while looking at the upcoming FA. I went to look at it, and found that it has a rewrite template on it. This was put on by a patroller who knows that feature articles aren't suppose to have these marks. It has been since August of this year since the rewrite has been placed. There may be more to this article that falls under FA requirements, but this is extremely noticeable. Summary: This can't be a FA according to the one of the rules. | ||
#{{User|Alex95}} Per [[MarioWiki:Featured_articles#Featured_article_standards|rule]] | |||
==== Keep featured article status ==== | ==== Keep featured article status ==== | ||
Revision as of 18:42, December 23, 2016
Kiddy Kong
Remove featured article status
- Yoshi the Space Station Manager (talk) Back in 2011, this page was put up to be unfeatured. It failed, but now I think it is time to have it unfeatured. I found this article while looking at the upcoming FA. I went to look at it, and found that it has a rewrite template on it. This was put on by a patroller who knows that feature articles aren't suppose to have these marks. It has been since August of this year since the rewrite has been placed. There may be more to this article that falls under FA requirements, but this is extremely noticeable. Summary: This can't be a FA according to the one of the rules.
- Alex95 (talk) Per rule
