Talk:Pink Coin (Super Mario Maker): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→Oppose) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
===Oppose=== | ===Oppose=== | ||
#{{user|Wildgoosespeeder}} I find this case to be similar to [[Green Star]] and [[Green Star (Super Mario 3D World)]]. Should we split [[Coin]] where [[Super Mario 64]]-like collecting games are different from [[Super Mario Bros.]]-like collecting games? How about splitting because some games use it as currency? No split. | #{{user|Wildgoosespeeder}} I find this case to be similar to [[Green Star]] and [[Green Star (Super Mario 3D World)]]. Should we split [[Coin]] where [[Super Mario 64]]-like collecting games are different from [[Super Mario Bros.]]-like collecting games? How about splitting because some games use it as currency? No split. | ||
#{{User|Yoshi the Space Station Manager}} While typing my fourth comment on [[Talk:Purple Coin]], I realized that to the general person (this includes number IPs) would want to search for pink coin. I don't think they should be taken to a page with two (or more) options. They should be taken to a page with both the information they want, and some other information they may not have looked at if it was on a separate page. And in the future when there are more than two games with different mechanics, pink coin should include all of those mechanics. (basically per Wildgoosespeeder) | |||
===Comments=== | ===Comments=== | ||
I am not sure quite yet which I am going to take. But I have an question. Couldn't you wait until after the [[Talk:Purple Coin|other proposal]] to be completed or at least more into it? {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 00:00, 20 December 2016 (EST) | I am not sure quite yet which I am going to take. But I have an question. Couldn't you wait until after the [[Talk:Purple Coin|other proposal]] to be completed or at least more into it? {{User:Yoshi the Space Station Manager/sig}} 00:00, 20 December 2016 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 12:51, December 20, 2016
Split into Template:Fakelink and Template:Fakelink
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, November 17, 2024, 12:21 GMT
The Pink Coins from this game obviously have different functions; Maker's are for collecting to obtain Keys, and Run's are collectibles that actually count toward 100%'ing the game. I say we split these into their respective game articles, and keep this page as a disambiguator.
Proposer: Toadette the Achiever (talk)
Deadline: January 3, 2017, at 23:59 GMT.
Support
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) Per proposal.
- Andymii (talk) I don't think the developers were thinking of referencing Mario Maker when they put the Pink Coin in Super Mario Run. Per proposal.
- Owencrazyboy9 (talk) Per both, especially Andymii. Plus the fact that the pink, purple and black coins are collectively known as Challenge Coins, so of course they function differently than the other pink and purple coins.
Oppose
- Wildgoosespeeder (talk) I find this case to be similar to Green Star and Green Star (Super Mario 3D World). Should we split Coin where Super Mario 64-like collecting games are different from Super Mario Bros.-like collecting games? How about splitting because some games use it as currency? No split.
- Yoshi the Space Station Manager (talk) While typing my fourth comment on Talk:Purple Coin, I realized that to the general person (this includes number IPs) would want to search for pink coin. I don't think they should be taken to a page with two (or more) options. They should be taken to a page with both the information they want, and some other information they may not have looked at if it was on a separate page. And in the future when there are more than two games with different mechanics, pink coin should include all of those mechanics. (basically per Wildgoosespeeder)
Comments
I am not sure quite yet which I am going to take. But I have an question. Couldn't you wait until after the other proposal to be completed or at least more into it? 
Yoshi the SSM (talk) 00:00, 20 December 2016 (EST)
