Category talk:Policies: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (PorpleBot moved page Category talk:MarioWiki Policy to Category talk:MarioWiki policies: Robot: Changing Category:MarioWiki Policy to Category:MarioWiki policies) |
m (Robot: Automated text replacement (-Category:Writer Guidelines +Category:Writing guidelines)) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Move? == | == Move? == | ||
Should we move [[MarioWiki:Canonicity]] and perhaps [[MarioWiki:Importance Policy]] under [[:Category: | Should we move [[MarioWiki:Canonicity]] and perhaps [[MarioWiki:Importance Policy]] under [[:Category:Writing guidelines]]? They seem to aim more toward writers than a general policy, like the personal images one. Also, those articles refer to how the writers should handle mainspace articles rather than lay down rules. What do you guys think?{{User:SpikeKnifeNeedleSword/sig}} 15:47, 24 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:11, December 4, 2016
Are we slacking?
Some of these are outdated. Other parts are completely unenforced.SaudyTalk!
- The only page I see that has troubles is the Personal images section. Everything else is fine. Wa
TC@Y 19:45, 9 April 2007 (EDT)
Move?
Should we move MarioWiki:Canonicity and perhaps MarioWiki:Importance Policy under Category:Writing guidelines? They seem to aim more toward writers than a general policy, like the personal images one. Also, those articles refer to how the writers should handle mainspace articles rather than lay down rules. What do you guys think?Knife (talk) 15:47, 24 August 2007 (EDT)
