Template talk:Not-unused: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
::I also noticed I can edit this template. I usually don't edit templates. Should I add the code to allow for the additional parameter? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:38, 20 January 2016 (EST) | ::I also noticed I can edit this template. I usually don't edit templates. Should I add the code to allow for the additional parameter? --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:38, 20 January 2016 (EST) | ||
:::Not until there's more support. You could ask {{User|Walkazo}} or {{User|Glowsquid}} for their opinion. --{{User:Henry Tucayo Clay/sig}} 16:41, 20 January 2016 (EST) | :::Not until there's more support. You could ask {{User|Walkazo}} or {{User|Glowsquid}} for their opinion. --{{User:Henry Tucayo Clay/sig}} 16:41, 20 January 2016 (EST) | ||
::::I think a better idea is to start a proposal. --{{User:Wildgoosespeeder/sig}} 16:44, 20 January 2016 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 16:44, January 20, 2016
Why category "Quality requested"?
Why are all images with this template in the category "Quality requested"? I see the category appears in the templates source code, but what's the reason? Or is it just an oversight? --Grandy02 12:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- That is indeed me doing sloppy copying of templates. - Cobold (talk · contribs) 20:14, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Specify Location The Image Is Being Used (Optional Parameter)
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Since this template is about protecting MediaWiki-specific unused images, should this template have an optional but recommended parameter to specify where the image is being used? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) 04:45, 25 December 2015 (EST)
- This would be quite useful for maintenance purposes. --
™ The 'Shroom 15:51, 20 January 2016 (EST)
- I also noticed I can edit this template. I usually don't edit templates. Should I add the code to allow for the additional parameter? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:38, 20 January 2016 (EST)
- Not until there's more support. You could ask Walkazo (talk) or Glowsquid (talk) for their opinion. --™ The 'Shroom 16:41, 20 January 2016 (EST)
- I think a better idea is to start a proposal. --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:44, 20 January 2016 (EST)
- Not until there's more support. You could ask Walkazo (talk) or Glowsquid (talk) for their opinion. --
- I also noticed I can edit this template. I usually don't edit templates. Should I add the code to allow for the additional parameter? --Wildgoosespeeder (talk) (Stats - Contribs) 16:38, 20 January 2016 (EST)
