Template talk:Distinguish: Difference between revisions
KurwaAntics (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
TheDarkStar (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
==Note== | ==Note== | ||
I changed a bit on the code in order to put more than one link in it. Forgot to add summary. [[User:UntergangerPlus|UntergangerPlus]] ([[User talk:UntergangerPlus|talk]]) 07:05, 10 February 2015 (EST) | I changed a bit on the code in order to put more than one link in it. Forgot to add summary. [[User:UntergangerPlus|UntergangerPlus]] ([[User talk:UntergangerPlus|talk]]) 07:05, 10 February 2015 (EST) | ||
==Necessary?== | |||
From what I can tell from the description, this template is used for when three things have a similar name. Problem is, {{tem|about}} has a similar function, as more subjects can be specified, as seen on [[Winged Goomba]]'s page. This is basically just a redundant watered-down version of {{tem|about}} that is redundantly redundant. Should we delete it and remove it from pages? Or just remove it, seeing as it's on the [[MarioWiki:BJAODN/Places#Flat Zone|BJAODN]]? {{User:TheDarkStar/sig}} 10:25, August 3, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 09:25, August 3, 2019
Two dots
For articles like Super Wario Bros. or Wario Bros., the template displays two succesive dots. But when words like "Super Mario Bros." end a sentence, one should only write one dot.
I tried to "fix" it but I can't do it.
Can something be done about this problem? Change the template code, use different syntax, ...?
Banon (talk · edits) 14:03, 25 May 2013 (EDT)
- Fixed the template, use the second method.-- 00:43, 4 July 2013 (EDT)
Note
I changed a bit on the code in order to put more than one link in it. Forgot to add summary. UntergangerPlus (talk) 07:05, 10 February 2015 (EST)
Necessary?
From what I can tell from the description, this template is used for when three things have a similar name. Problem is, {{about}} has a similar function, as more subjects can be specified, as seen on Winged Goomba's page. This is basically just a redundant watered-down version of {{about}} that is redundantly redundant. Should we delete it and remove it from pages? Or just remove it, seeing as it's on the BJAODN? TheDarkStar 
10:25, August 3, 2019 (EDT)
