MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Nintendo Entertainment System: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
#{{User|Pwwnd123}} I think the article has a very decent amount of information to be considered as a featured article. It has no improvement tags whatsoever. Although it may not be that much, I believe it is a concise article. I believe the Hardware section contains a good amount of info to be considered featured. I think concise articles are the way to go for me.  
#{{User|Pwwnd123}} I think the article has a very decent amount of information to be considered as a featured article. It has no improvement tags whatsoever. Although it may not be that much, I believe it is a concise article. I believe the Hardware section contains a good amount of info to be considered featured. I think concise articles are the way to go for me.  
==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#{{User|Mario}} A tad short. Also, the Hardware section seems to be written in a way only a graduate in game engineering would understand. I guess details are nice, but this wiki's audience wouldn't understand it, and that's bad. Finally, you've watched AVGN tear some NES accessories to pieces; where's the Power Pad? Also, what about the Zapper and even R.O.B.? The NES Advantage and the NES Max? You can add some of that information here. Finally, the beginning section is a mess, with spotty, incoherent information. So yeah, no feature.


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====

Revision as of 14:30, August 12, 2014

Nintendo Entertainment System

Support

  1. Pwwnd123 (talk) I think the article has a very decent amount of information to be considered as a featured article. It has no improvement tags whatsoever. Although it may not be that much, I believe it is a concise article. I believe the Hardware section contains a good amount of info to be considered featured. I think concise articles are the way to go for me.

Oppose

  1. Mario (talk) A tad short. Also, the Hardware section seems to be written in a way only a graduate in game engineering would understand. I guess details are nice, but this wiki's audience wouldn't understand it, and that's bad. Finally, you've watched AVGN tear some NES accessories to pieces; where's the Power Pad? Also, what about the Zapper and even R.O.B.? The NES Advantage and the NES Max? You can add some of that information here. Finally, the beginning section is a mess, with spotty, incoherent information. So yeah, no feature.

Removal of Opposes

Comments