MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Kart: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | #{{User|Randombob-omb4761}} Why? It looks fine. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? [http://www.mariowiki.com/MarioWiki:Featured_Articles#Featured_Article_standards WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???] | ||
#{{User|Tails777}} I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but the subject's connection to the series has nothing to do with featured status. If the quality is good then it can be featured. There is nothing wrong with this article so I see no reason to unfeature it. | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== |
Revision as of 22:21, July 22, 2014
Kart
Remove Featured Article Status
Keep Featured Article Status
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Why? It looks fine.
- Baby Luigi (talk) Can you STOP making UNFA's because they're "important" to the Mario series? WHERE in the rules or ANYWHERE does it say "this article MUST be about an important item"???
- Tails777 (talk) I'm sure I'm not the first to say this, but the subject's connection to the series has nothing to do with featured status. If the quality is good then it can be featured. There is nothing wrong with this article so I see no reason to unfeature it.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
The point of unfeaturing nominations is to point out fundamental flaws in the article's content (writing style, presentation, completeness, images). Notability can be a valid argument, but if the subject isn't notable, such article wouldn't exist anyway. Also, you should specify how this article "isn't good enough". Is it poorly written? Does it look cluttered? Is the information outdated? Is there reasonable coverage? Are there any improvement templates? Those are the basic questions you have to ask first before making any sort of nomination here. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 21:25, 22 July 2014 (EDT)