MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Culex: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. {{User:Mario/sig}} 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | ||
::Ok, then {{User:Ashley and Red/sig}} | ::Ok, then {{User:Ashley and Red/sig}} | ||
::While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. [[User:Vommack|Vommack]] ([[User talk:Vommack|talk]]) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:39, April 3, 2014
Culex
Remove Featured Article Status
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) I don't understand why this is a featured article, it's too short, and the final fantasty stuff is spectulation. Were the 2011 users crazy?
- Ashley and Red (talk) This article doesn't seems to be good. The "alusions to FF series" has speculation (He isn't an Black Mage, Dark Knights REALLY exists in Final Fantasy).
Keep Featured Article Status
- Tails777 (talk) Length doesn't always matter. We have shorter articles than this one. Plus the quality of the article also counts and I don't see anything wrong with it.
- bluetoad63 (talk) Per Tails.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
Comments
No it's not, it's 3000 bytes more. Yoshi876 (talk)
I just got rid of it, on my own. 
Bluetoad63
13:41, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
Bytes =/= article length. Changing the color of the text, for instance, adds bytes without actually increasing article content. So be careful when judging articles by byte size. 
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 14:31, 2 April 2014 (EDT)
The Final Fantasy stuff may be speculation, but unlike most "theories", this one is well-substantiated, and so, it can stay. It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 18:33, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
- Ok, then User:Ashley and Red/sig
- While the "theory" may be well-substantiated, it doesn't seem quite right for a good chunk of what is supposed to be an exemplar article to be what amounts to a glorified Trivia section. Vommack (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2014 (EDT)
