Talk:Mattermouth: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Megadardery (talk | contribs) m (→Comments) |
Megadardery (talk | contribs) m (→Comments) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
====Comments==== | ====Comments==== | ||
'''@Walkazo''': but is a resemblance enough to warrant them as a sub-species? | '''@Walkazo''': but is a resemblance enough to warrant them as a sub-species?--{{User:Megadardery/sig}} 15:43, 2 January 2014 (EST) |
Revision as of 15:43, January 2, 2014
Where's the source for the name? --FREAK ~Game Freak~ OUT!
the name is offical as BMB say it in the strategy guide he has. --Lindsay151 21:53, 23 May 2010 (EDT)
Stop considering Mattermouths as Dry Bones
![]() |
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Sunday, February 23, 2025, 09:55 GMT
They look nothing like a Dry Bones, i don't understand why there that kind of species.
Proposer: Randombob-omb4761 (talk)
Deadline: January 16, 2014, 23:59 GMT
Support
- Randombob-omb4761 (talk) Per proposal.
Oppose
- Walkazo (talk) - They look like Dry Bones skulls so it's not illogical, and lumping them together is good for organization. It doesn't need to be a perfect fit, and the article merely says there's a "resembl[ance]" anyway.
Comments
@Walkazo: but is a resemblance enough to warrant them as a sub-species?--
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad96f/ad96f2179ff370cd1ae398a3da016c9a0c7cb699" alt="Dashbot signature"
15:43, 2 January 2014 (EST)