MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Miracle Book: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Comments) |
|||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The article does look good, but maybe adding short descriptions of each page could make it even better. Just a suggestion, not saying anything is wrong with the article in its current state. {{User|Tails777}} | The article does look good, but maybe adding short descriptions of each page could make it even better. Just a suggestion, not saying anything is wrong with the article in its current state. {{User|Tails777}} | ||
:We probably don't need short descriptions, though, since a picture is worth a thousand words. Much as with the majority of the image captions in this wiki, the short descriptions will only point out what readers can figure out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | :We probably don't need short descriptions, though, since a picture is worth a thousand words. Much as with the majority of the image captions in this wiki, the short descriptions will only point out what readers can figure out. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | ||
::Alright then, just checking. {{User|Tails777}} | |||
Revision as of 18:49, December 17, 2013
Miracle Book
Support
- Baby Luigi (talk) I think this qualifies for a great featured list. It's reasonably long, it's complete, the summary has a decent length and it has an extra gallery filled with pictures from the book. I worked hard on getting high quality images via emulator, and I think it would look nice. Just because it has barely any words doesn't mean it won't look great: pictures can describe more than words, and featuring this article proves this point. Think of the pictures as another way of adding in-game descriptions like the other Featured Lists.
- Tails777 (talk)
- LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- Icemario11 (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
The article does look good, but maybe adding short descriptions of each page could make it even better. Just a suggestion, not saying anything is wrong with the article in its current state. Tails777 (talk)
- We probably don't need short descriptions, though, since a picture is worth a thousand words. Much as with the majority of the image captions in this wiki, the short descriptions will only point out what readers can figure out. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
