MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mystic Forest: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
#{{User|Icemario11}} Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. No red links, has wide range of good quality images and no improvement tags. I fail to see why this shouldn't become a featured article. | #{{User|Icemario11}} Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. No red links, has wide range of good quality images and no improvement tags. I fail to see why this shouldn't become a featured article. | ||
#{{User|Ztar Power}} | #{{User|Ztar Power}} | ||
#{{User|WeHatePoisonMushrooms66}} | #{{User|WeHatePoisonMushrooms66}} | ||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
Revision as of 17:05, October 30, 2013
Mystic Forest
Support
- Icemario11 (talk) Well-written, detailed descriptions of each level for the world with no (as far as I can tell) spelling or grammar mistakes present, and isn't at all a stub. No red links, has wide range of good quality images and no improvement tags. I fail to see why this shouldn't become a featured article.
- Ztar Power (talk)
- WeHatePoisonMushrooms66 (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I read the first parts of the article and the grammar isn't too bad. However, you tend to make quite lengthy sentences. I also trimmed some space on the article. Baby Luigi (talk) @Mr.L1998: "Minor" is subjective, and this isn't talking about the articles content itself, but rather about the quality of the article. You can never have too much images in a gallery too: they help paint a picture of what the subject is about, and we're better as visual learners. The only valid oppose is the opening is too short....that could be fixed Baby Luigi (talk)
