MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Super Paper Mario: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lord Bowser (talk | contribs) (→Oppose) |
Lord Bowser (talk | contribs) m (→Oppose) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
#{{User|Pinkie Pie}} I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured. | #{{User|Pinkie Pie}} I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured. | ||
#{{User|Baby Luigi}} The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed? | #{{User|Baby Luigi}} The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed? | ||
{{User|Mr. Game & Watch}} The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it. | #{{User|Mr. Game & Watch}} The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it. | ||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 23:11, June 19, 2013
Super Paper Mario
Support
Oppose
- Pinkie Pie (talk) I strongly disagree with you. The Super Paper Mario page isn't ready to be featured, because the rewritten template is still on the page, meaning it need to be rewritten before it can be featured.
- Baby Luigi (talk) The rewrite complaint that unfeatured the article in the first place is still there, so why did you renominate it if the problems aren't fixed?
- Mr. Game & Watch (talk) The article itself is still in poor condition; there's still a lot of flowery writing, I saw some grammar mistakes mixed around the page, and there's still a rewrite template on it.
