Talk:Wii Coconut Mall: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
You were  editwarring thats why. --{{User:N64dude/sig}} 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
You were  editwarring thats why. --{{User:N64dude/sig}} 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
::Edit-warring? That wasn't even doing that.. --{{User:A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros./sig}} 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
::Edit-warring? That wasn't even doing that.. --{{User:A Paragoomba and the Koopa Bros./sig}} 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
:::Paragoomba, calm down. Parts of the section were poorly written, and while your attempt to fix it is appreciated, your changes made the section unnecessarily wordy, and some changes were grammatically incorrect, so I retained the portions of the original section which had no problems and revised the rest in order to convey what you had in fewer words. {{User:Mario4Ever/sig}} 18:20, 11 May 2013 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:20, May 11, 2013

Coconut Mall or Coconut's Mall? Time Questions 14:49, 13 April 2008 (EDT)

Anyone? The template says "Coconut's Mall", but the article is called Coconut Mall. Time Questions 01:34, 17 April 2008 (EDT)

It is called Coconut Mall.Knife (talk) 15:05, 11 May 2008 (EDT)

Isle Delfino

Just to be certain, is it more likely than not it takes place in Isle Delfino? I would assume yes, but you never know.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kobble (talk).

This isn't fair

Why are my edits getting reverted? The one I done was better than the old, which was poorly written. APA TKB Umbreon, from Pokémon. 18:14, 11 May 2013 (EDT)

Uhh! I hate this! --APA TKB Umbreon, from Pokémon. 18:17, 11 May 2013 (EDT)

You were editwarring thats why. --Nintendo 64 logodude 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)

Edit-warring? That wasn't even doing that.. --APA TKB Umbreon, from Pokémon. 18:18, 11 May 2013 (EDT)
Paragoomba, calm down. Parts of the section were poorly written, and while your attempt to fix it is appreciated, your changes made the section unnecessarily wordy, and some changes were grammatically incorrect, so I retained the portions of the original section which had no problems and revised the rest in order to convey what you had in fewer words. Mario4Ever (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2013 (EDT)