MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Dry Bones: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Removal of Support/Oppose Votes: Corrected my incorrect word usage) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
{{User|1upMSGoomba}} | {{User|1upMSGoomba}} | ||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Just because Dry Bones is your favourite character it doesn't mean we can keep him featured, Yoshi is my favourite character and I haven't tried featuring him because his article isn't up to featured article standards | #{{User|Yoshi876}} Just because Dry Bones is your favourite character it doesn't mean we can keep him featured, Yoshi is my favourite character and I haven't tried featuring him because his article isn't up to featured article standards | ||
{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} | |||
#{{User|Yoshi876}} Your opposition only accounts for the original problem, but doesn't account for the new problem that has been highlighted | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== |
Revision as of 06:55, February 16, 2013
Dry Bones
Remove Featured Article Status
- Yoshi876 (talk) The Mario and Sonic at the Olympic Games section is a stub
- YoshiFan1200 (talk) I think that The Adventures of Super Mario Bros. 3, Mind Your Mummy Mommy, Mario, Never Koop a Koopa, Mario Kart DS and Recycled Koopa are too small. More information, if possible? I think that the Mario Striker Charged Dry Bones image needs a white background, or invisible if possible. I also think that Mario & Sonic series section is VERY small.
Keep Featured Article Status
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) the section stub was removed.
- 1upMSGoomba (talk) Per MDT; Dry Bones is also one of my favorite characters, so we can't unfeature him.
- King Pikante (talk) Per MDT.
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes
- Yoshi876 (talk) Just because Dry Bones is your favourite character it doesn't mean we can keep him featured, Yoshi is my favourite character and I haven't tried featuring him because his article isn't up to featured article standards
- Yoshi876 (talk) Your opposition only accounts for the original problem, but doesn't account for the new problem that has been highlighted