MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Hoops 3-on-3: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Support) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{FANOMSTAT | |||
|nominated=14:56, 14 October 2012 | |||
</ | |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2009) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.--> | ||
}} | |||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== |
Revision as of 21:08, November 9, 2012
Mario Hoops 3-on-3
Support
- Yoshi K (talk) I was looking for articles that deserved to be FAs, so I looked at this article and said, "Wow." This article is very well-written, has no improvement tags, has a good lead, no red-links (the red stuff in the article is coloring), has a lot of info about the game, and has many good-quality images. I double-checked it for mistakes, and I still can't find anything wrong with it! I think this should be featured.
- World10 (talk)
- SmartYoshi (talk)
- Mariobros1985 (talk)
Oppose
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Needs better quality pictures and more pictures overall.
- Vommack (talk) Per all.
- DKPetey99 (talk) Per my comments below.
Removal of Opposes
Comments
I agree more images should be added. Also, I feel the items list is unorganized. Most games have a chart for images, and I think this one needs one, too. The character chart is also iffy, as the centering is off. I do agree that the information is extraordinary, however it's physical quality seems messy or not good enough. I'll see what I can do regarding changing the appearance. But for now I'm opposing. DKPetey99TCE