Talk:Bell Kritter: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Coooool123 (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
====Support==== | ====Support==== | ||
#{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy. | #{{User|YoshiKong}} Per policy. | ||
#{{User|Coooool123}} Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!! | |||
====Oppose==== | ====Oppose==== | ||
====Comments?==== | ====Comments?==== | ||
Revision as of 08:38, October 3, 2012
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
Is there anything that separates these Kritters from other Kritters? Hello, I'm Time Turner.
They seem to be characters, but extremely minor characters. I agree, this article probably shouldn't stand alone.--Knife (talk) 04:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Merge this article with Kritter#Donkey Kong 64
|
This talk page section contains an unresolved talk page proposal. Please try to help and resolve the issue by voting or leaving a comment. |
Current time: Wednesday, November 27, 2024, 01:07 GMT
As discussed above, this article concerns a minor subject which is subordinated from a greater species. I stand by the policy at MarioWiki:Minor NPCs, which describes that conjectural-named, minor characters should be merged with their relevant species.
Proposer: YoshiKong (talk)
Deadline: October 17 2012, 23:59 GMT
Support
- YoshiKong (talk) Per policy.
- Coooool123 (talk) Per Yoshikong. Plus, do we really need yet another tiny article, wasting space? MERGE POWER!!!
