Talk:Virtual Boy Mario Kart: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
for the sake of clarity, [http://www.planetvb.com/content/articles/scans/big_n_ger/07-08_00/big_n_ger_07-08_00_2.jpg here's] the relevant scan. | for the sake of clarity, [http://www.planetvb.com/content/articles/scans/big_n_ger/07-08_00/big_n_ger_07-08_00_2.jpg here's] the relevant scan. | ||
:Thank you so much anonymous person who forgot to put a signature! [[User:Pengmunk|Pengmunk]] ([[User talk:Pengmunk|talk]]) 22:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | |||
For what it's worth, I don't think this deserve an ''article'', it's the same situation as the Donkey Kong [[CD-i]] game where the only thing know is" it existed" and thus there's absolutely no material for a decent page. Until more information surface, it'd be better off as a note on the [[Virtual Boy]] page. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 21:45, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | For what it's worth, I don't think this deserve an ''article'', it's the same situation as the Donkey Kong [[CD-i]] game where the only thing know is" it existed" and thus there's absolutely no material for a decent page. Until more information surface, it'd be better off as a note on the [[Virtual Boy]] page. --[[User:Glowsquid|Glowsquid]] ([[User talk:Glowsquid|talk]]) 21:45, 11 September 2012 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 21:03, September 11, 2012
Can someone please add more information to this page? It's a real game and it shouldn't be removed. Pengmunk (talk) 21:02, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- Once a proper reference is placed, then maybe some work can begin on it. The ref u placed does not work... Jackpot
Jordan 21:22, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- Yes a Nintendo Magazine reference does count as a proper reference. Raven Effect (talk)
- No no as in I can't access it... yes of course it would be proper otherwise. JackpotJordan 21:28, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
- So all those strategy guide references and magazine references need to be removed because they aren't proper sources eh? Raven Effect (talk)
- No no as in I can't access it... yes of course it would be proper otherwise. Jackpot
for the sake of clarity, here's the relevant scan.
- Thank you so much anonymous person who forgot to put a signature! Pengmunk (talk) 22:03, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
For what it's worth, I don't think this deserve an article, it's the same situation as the Donkey Kong CD-i game where the only thing know is" it existed" and thus there's absolutely no material for a decent page. Until more information surface, it'd be better off as a note on the Virtual Boy page. --Glowsquid (talk) 21:45, 11 September 2012 (EDT)
