MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario 3D Land: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
You're not actually supposed to put signatures on vote pages (Proposals and FA noms)--{{User|Commander Code-8}} | You're not actually supposed to put signatures on vote pages (Proposals and FA noms)--{{User|Commander Code-8}} | ||
It seems as though everyone shrugged off my last comment on the whole thing about images. So I'm gonna put one more pic on the main story section,then you guys can give me your opinion if you disagree with image. If somebody gives me a good reason,then I will glady take it down. {{User|RosalinaSilverCrown}} | |||
Revision as of 16:29, August 6, 2012
Super Mario 3D Land
Support
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) I think Super Mario 3D Land deserves to be a FA, because it isn't too short or long, and the pictures aren't that bad.
- Spenzer66 (talk)
- MarioGameChampion (talk)
- RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
- Commander Code-8 (talk)
Oppose
- LightningBlue (talk) I agree with the statement above and was going to say the exact same thing. And I have played the game. One image can stay on the section but the rest need to be moved into the gallery.
Removal of Opposes
LightningBlue
- Commander Code-8 (talk) Now that that problem's been fixed his oppose is outdated
Comments
I'm not going to Oppose this but would of liked some tables in this article instead of lots of listed items like this:
Apart from that, the article is very good. New Super Yoshi (talk)
@Commander Code-8:
The picture make it more detailed. All of them are needed.
Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:36, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.
Let's make this Featured! Anyone want to?
Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) 18:46, 3 August 2012 (EDT)Electrical Bowser jr.
Like Electrical Bowser jr. said, the pictures make the article much more detailed. Mainly for people who haven't played the game. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
- The amount of images in that section don't even stay next to the text they relate to, which doesn't really look good at all. Is that much detail really needed?--Commander Code-8 (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2012 (EDT)
Alright! I deleted all of them except Bowser capturing Peach!
Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!
I think we need at least about 2 to 3 images from features to the bottom. I think there's is a lot of text and lists there but only a few images. 
YoshiGo99
Are 8 images good enough?
Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!
I think at least up to 5. I can add them if you want.YoshiGo99 (talk)
Also, shouldn't we make the loooong feature list shorter? Like a table? World10 (talk)
I think that at least two of the main story's images should be put back on the article. If we have pics of development,then we can at least have the main story a bit more visual. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
There are already 8 images, so 3 need to be deleted.
Hi! I'm Electrical Bowser jr.!
Oh, by the way, does anyone like my new sig?
You're not actually supposed to put signatures on vote pages (Proposals and FA noms)--Commander Code-8 (talk)
It seems as though everyone shrugged off my last comment on the whole thing about images. So I'm gonna put one more pic on the main story section,then you guys can give me your opinion if you disagree with image. If somebody gives me a good reason,then I will glady take it down. RosalinaSilverCrown (talk)
