MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/New Super Mario Bros. Mii: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) (→Oppose: Yo, definitely not unretired or anything. Just saw this awful nomination and had to oppose it.) |
(→Oppose) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it | ||
#{{user|Bloc Partier}} - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list. | #{{user|Bloc Partier}} - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list. | ||
#{{user|Mario jc}} Per all. | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
Revision as of 06:31, July 31, 2012
New Super Mario Bros. Mii
Support
Oppose
- GreenDisaster (talk) First, "its wonderful" is not a good reason. How is it wonderful? You need to elaborate on that. Also, who are you agreeing with? The article itself is incredibly lackluster. I know we can't exactly add much info to a tech demo, but that's precisely why it can't be a featured article. It's just a relatively small intro, a list, and a single trivia piece. For a featured list, that could work, but this is supposed to be an article, so no go.
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk) Per GreenDisaster.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) This article is just a list. It wouldn't even work as a featured list because... Well I don't even have to say it
- Bloc Partier (talk) - Terrible. Why is this even still a nomination? There is no way it will ever meet the word count, nor is it even a true list.
- Mario jc (talk) Per all.
