MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N2/Goomba: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
#{{User|GreenDisaster}} The Names in other languages doesn't need any citations, and none of the Trivia pieces need any citations either. | #{{User|GreenDisaster}} The Names in other languages doesn't need any citations, and none of the Trivia pieces need any citations either. | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} None of the Trivia and Names in Other Languages details need citations. If you can prove it by playing the game, it doesn't need a source. Also, these reasons alone aren't enough to unfeature an article in my opinion anyway. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} None of the Trivia and Names in Other Languages details need citations. If you can prove it by playing the game, it doesn't need a source. Also, these reasons alone aren't enough to unfeature an article in my opinion anyway. | ||
:'''Comment''' actually, just a '''tiny''' mistake can lead to unfeaturing, because if one mistake is anywhere near the guidelines for FAs, then that would affect it. | :'''Comment''' actually, just a '''tiny''' mistake can lead to unfeaturing, because if one mistake is anywhere near the guidelines for FAs, then that would affect it.[[User:987li|987li]] 04:25, 24 April 2012 (EDT) | ||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per the above people. | #{{User|Commander Code-8}} Per the above people. | ||
#{{User|MarioSmasher}} Do we need even sources '''for names in other languages and for the trivia?!''' You know it, you can prove the trivia by playing the games, and for the other languages' names, they don't even need citations. Per all, and those reasons '''are not enough for an unfeaturing'''. | #{{User|MarioSmasher}} Do we need even sources '''for names in other languages and for the trivia?!''' You know it, you can prove the trivia by playing the games, and for the other languages' names, they don't even need citations. Per all, and those reasons '''are not enough for an unfeaturing'''. | ||
Revision as of 03:25, April 24, 2012
Goomba
Remove Featured Article Status
- 987li (talk)This article has mostly perfect grammar, spelling and use of punctuation. It has a great use of links and images. As with MW:CITE, it shows that articles with information that is in an in-universe style provided from a source from the game (all of Goomba's roles in the games) itself does not need to be sourced. However, information that is provided outside the games, such as "Trivia" and "Names in other languages" (sections) are not sourced.
Keep Featured Article Status
- GreenDisaster (talk) The Names in other languages doesn't need any citations, and none of the Trivia pieces need any citations either.
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) None of the Trivia and Names in Other Languages details need citations. If you can prove it by playing the game, it doesn't need a source. Also, these reasons alone aren't enough to unfeature an article in my opinion anyway.
- Comment actually, just a tiny mistake can lead to unfeaturing, because if one mistake is anywhere near the guidelines for FAs, then that would affect it.987li 04:25, 24 April 2012 (EDT)
- Commander Code-8 (talk) Per the above people.
- MarioSmasher (talk) Do we need even sources for names in other languages and for the trivia?! You know it, you can prove the trivia by playing the games, and for the other languages' names, they don't even need citations. Per all, and those reasons are not enough for an unfeaturing.
- Comment Now I understand that we can keep the "Trivia" section unsourced. However, we need sources for the other languages sections. This is because you have to make the name correct, not just by translating it somewhere. If the section's info was collected by visiting the website of the selected language's version of the game, then you must source it. I'm not saying you're having a lack of sources though. 987li 04:24, 24 April 2012 (EDT)
