The 'Shroom:Issue LVII/Character Reviews: Difference between revisions
Time Turner (talk | contribs) m (Removing broken link) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOEDITSECTION__ __NOTOC__ <noinclude><div class="shroomholiday2011"><center>http://www. | __NOEDITSECTION__ __NOTOC__ <noinclude><div class="shroomholiday2011"><center>http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif http://www.mariowiki.com/images/6/6b/XLights2.gif</center></noinclude><div class="right"><h2 style="font-family:Kunstler Script;font-size:350%;color:black">Character Reviews</h2> | ||
http://www. | |||
by {{user|Marioguy1}}</div> | by {{user|Marioguy1}}</div> | ||
Latest revision as of 02:44, January 10, 2018
Hello again everyone! This month, to end off the year, I think we’ll do a penultimate review. This month this review will be of Magnus von Grapple 2.0 – the last appearance of Lord Crump in the entire game!
Magnus von Grapple 2.0
If you look back at my review of the original, I said he was “good end-boss material”. I still stand by that remark, and I think Magnus von Grapple 2.0 is also good end boss material. However he is reused good end boss material. He really isn’t all that different from the original Magnus von Grapple and I really don’t see him as different either.
Magnus von Grapple was a good idea, but Nintendo should have kept him in his own chapter. Or maybe made Magnus von Grapple 2.0 a giant robot (to be unique). Either way, I don’t really like what they did to “change” him that much.
Total
While he is still a good idea, Magnus von Grapple 2.0 is basically just another Magnus von Grapple so he will get a 6.5/10. Thanks for reading this ridiculously short holiday section, and come back in 2012 for the final review for TTYD!
