MarioWiki talk:Personal files: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::::::Actually, I agree with Knife. We should have a set size standard for sigs. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 00:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | :::::::Actually, I agree with Knife. We should have a set size standard for sigs. -- [[Image:Shyghost.PNG]][[User:Ghost Jam|Chris]][[Image:Shyghost.PNG]] 00:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
::::::::I think sig text should stay the same size because sigs can tell people what the user's personality is like. If the person's personality is reflected in their big lettering or big images, then that tells other users who that user is and what they may be like. {{User:Plumber/sig}} | ::::::::I think sig text should stay the same size because sigs can tell people what the user's personality is like. If the person's personality is reflected in their big lettering or big images, then that tells other users who that user is and what they may be like. {{User:Plumber/sig}} | ||
I agree that the writing size shouldn't be too large, and the pixs should be a little bigger.--{{User:Aipom/sig}}-- |
Revision as of 18:06, March 20, 2007
20 px is way to small! Max2 you can't see the images!
- That's the point. If the image is unrecognizable at 20px, the image was too big right from the get go. Remember, this is speaking of sig images, which must fit in a small space and not stretch the screen. --
Chris
22:36, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- On that point, there is some leeway. Take the spooks in my sig. They are bigger than 20px (which would look like this:
). It's just a guide line. --
Chris
22:38, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- If it looks better at 30px, you can scale it to there. Wa
TC@Y 22:52, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- C'mon, can't it be 50px?
- I for one do not understand why we keep limits on size. Some users have large text in their sigs which is pretty much the same as an image. If anything, users should shrink the text in their sigs as well if this rule is to be enforced.Knife (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- >:(
- Actually, I agree with Knife. We should have a set size standard for sigs. --
Chris
00:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
- Actually, I agree with Knife. We should have a set size standard for sigs. --
- >:(
- I for one do not understand why we keep limits on size. Some users have large text in their sigs which is pretty much the same as an image. If anything, users should shrink the text in their sigs as well if this rule is to be enforced.Knife (talk) 23:09, 19 March 2007 (EDT)
- C'mon, can't it be 50px?
- If it looks better at 30px, you can scale it to there. Wa
- On that point, there is some leeway. Take the spooks in my sig. They are bigger than 20px (which would look like this:
I agree that the writing size shouldn't be too large, and the pixs should be a little bigger.-- Aipom
--