MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Petey Piranha: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 24: Line 24:
#{{User|Yoshidude99}} There is no mistakes on this page and if there is they can easily be corrected.
#{{User|Yoshidude99}} There is no mistakes on this page and if there is they can easily be corrected.
#{{User|Technickal}}: Per all.
#{{User|Technickal}}: Per all.
#{{User|Nintendo4DS}} How could you? I don't see anything worng. Petey is awesome. Why?


====Removal of Support/Oppose Votes====
====Removal of Support/Oppose Votes====

Revision as of 21:04, November 12, 2011

Petey Piranha

Remove Featured Article Status

Keep Featured Article Status

  1. Pokémon Trainer Mario (talk) Someone can just fix it.
  2. LeftyGreenMario (talk) I fixed the tenses, so, no tense tag.
  3. Mario4Ever (talk) Per LGM.
  4. MrConcreteDonkey (talk): I think it's quite obvious 'he' refers to Petey when there's an article about him. And Petey isn't a nickname, it's most likely his first name. Just like Donald Duck. We don't call Mario 'Mario Mario' everywhere related to the Super Mario Bros. Movie. The rest are just minor errors, maybe made as a typo or by users who are not as experienced as most of us in English, which can be fixed with one edit. These are all perfectly valid reasons, per all.
  5. Mario Fan 123 (talk) Per Pokémon Trainer Mario. Fixing that is something that you can do in 5 minutes, then why making a whole proposal? I sometimes facepalm at the attitude of some people in these situations, you know... Also, no tense or rewrite templates.
  6. Mario Bros.! (talk)Where in the world is a tense, rewrite, etc. template on this page?
  7. Superfiremario (talk) Per MrConcreteDonkey
  8. BoygeyDude (talk) I don't see why we need to unfeature.
  9. Goomsplatter X (talk) It's a great article, it just needs a little work done.
  10. GEX (talk) yeah,what he said.
  11. Mesuxelf (talk) Its good.
  12. Greentoad (talk) I don't see anything wrong with this page.
  13. YoshiMonsta (talk) I don't see a problem. And also Petey is a beloved Mario enemy. Why do it??
  14. 20jiayiming (talk) I think since Petey has been in many games why make it unfeatured?!
  15. Yoshidude99 (talk) There is no mistakes on this page and if there is they can easily be corrected.
  16. Technickal (talk): Per all.
  17. Nintendo4DS (talk) How could you? I don't see anything worng. Petey is awesome. Why?

Removal of Support/Oppose Votes

Pokémon Trainer Mario

  1. DKPetey99 (talk) No reason stated, must give a valid reason.
  2. Fawfulfury65 (talk) That article must be flawless to be featured, it doesn't matter if it can be fixed.

Comments

I still see incorrect tense in some sections. I also would imagine Petey appeared in at least one of the Super Mario-Kun comics due to the amount of games he has been in and how each comic is based on the game. DKPetey99 15:35, 27 May 2011 (EDT)

@MrConcreteDonkey, saying "Someone can just fix it." is not a valid reason. Also it seems you've ignored other problems in my vote. Tense is written incorrectly. It cannot stay featured that way! DKPetey99 08:41, 28 May 2011 (EDT)

Look at MSM section: "This game also marks the first time Petey spits goop since 2004 in Mario Power Tennis, unless one counts New Play Control! Mario Power Tennis, which is a remake of Mario Power Tennis, or Mario Strikers Charged Football, since he spits "mud" rather than "goop"." Vaguely written. DKPetey99 08:46, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
Okay, I see your points, but add Super Mario-Kun, and I'll change my vote. Also is this line true? "He's also large... Twice as big as Bowser. He is 5 meters tall and weighs 560 kilograms... slightly heavier than a real world moose. He is also one of the largest characters in the series, though Exor is considerably larger, just 30 meters (99 feet) in length and weighing 908 kilograms." DKPetey99 08:59, 28 May 2011 (EDT)
If there is no source, then remove it. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
I'm goanna say this one more time! If something is missing from the history section, it is incomplete. How can we have a featured article with an incomplete history section. And @Opposers, why do I have to fix it? It is incomplete. Everyone who proposes for an article to become unfeatured doesn't fix it, but all of a sudden, I have to fix it? DKPetey99 12:32, 7 June 2011 (EDT)
Every featured article with something minor to fix doesn't get an unfeature nomination. MrConcreteDonkey (talk)