File talk:MSSParagomba.PNG: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Vellidragon (talk | contribs) |
m (Comment.) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I put this in the file talk page in case I'm missing any universally obvious reason here that said YoshiGo99 had to revert my upload; the fact that they gave no reason at all seems to imply that there is one. If not, they should have put one in the summary or left it intact.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:08, 7 October 2011 (EDT) | I put this in the file talk page in case I'm missing any universally obvious reason here that said YoshiGo99 had to revert my upload; the fact that they gave no reason at all seems to imply that there is one. If not, they should have put one in the summary or left it intact.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:08, 7 October 2011 (EDT) | ||
:There was a related proposal a month or two ago dealing with transparency, but its only decision was to remove transparency if it ruined the image, so I don't think there's a universal reason for that. {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 16:13, October 7, 2011
Reverting
|
This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment. |
So not to start an edit war about this, why exactly was my transparent version reverted to the non-transparent one? It's not the "pixelated" version that was reverted before, I actually spent about an hour cleaning up the edges, and the person reverting my upload gave no reason at all.--vellidragon 17:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
Ask YoshiGo99 (talk). PikaSamus (talk)
I put this in the file talk page in case I'm missing any universally obvious reason here that said YoshiGo99 had to revert my upload; the fact that they gave no reason at all seems to imply that there is one. If not, they should have put one in the summary or left it intact.--vellidragon 17:08, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
