MarioWiki talk:Appeals: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Comment.) |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Suggestion== | ==Suggestion== | ||
It needs comments section badly. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}} | It needs comments section badly. {{User:SWFlash/Sig}} | ||
==Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?== | |||
The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning ''was'' a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... {{User:Bop1996/sig}} | |||
Revision as of 18:19, May 13, 2011
???
Why was the article unprotected?--Holyromanemperortatan 19:07, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- So people can make appeals, which was the whole purpose of the page.
Yoshiwaker 
19:09, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
- Ohhh. Well thank you to both of you!--Holyromanemperortatan 19:12, 5 May 2011 (EDT)
- Also, the only reason it was protected was because it was under construction. Mario4Ever (talk)
This may or may not be a stupid question, but...
Can anyone put notices on a user's page if a reminder/warning given by him or her is in dispute and the user who received the warning/reminder does not alert the other user, or is this limited solely to the administration? Mario4Ever (talk)
Suggestion
It needs comments section badly. SWFlash
Look at me, I found a potential problem, ain't I something?
The page says that you cannot appeal a reminder issued by an Administrator, but the first appeal is one where the user that issued the reminder/warning was a sysop when the reminder/warning was issued, but is not anymore? It seems we need more specificity here... Bop1996 (Talk)
