Talk:Gnat Attack: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


==Split Enemies from Gnat Attack==
==Split Enemies from Gnat Attack==
{{TPP}}
{{SettledTPP}}
<span style="color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS;font-size:150%">SPLIT 10-0</span>
 
The enemies section of this article is not how a usual enemies section should look; it has all enemies within it. These enemies are unique enemies, they have their own quirks, their own methods of destruction, and there is even a boss character in there! All of the enemies in that enemies section should be split out into their own articles; as they are valid enemies, even if they had minor appearances.
The enemies section of this article is not how a usual enemies section should look; it has all enemies within it. These enemies are unique enemies, they have their own quirks, their own methods of destruction, and there is even a boss character in there! All of the enemies in that enemies section should be split out into their own articles; as they are valid enemies, even if they had minor appearances.


Line 14: Line 16:
These enemies are part of the game, they are content, they are allowed.
These enemies are part of the game, they are content, they are allowed.


{{scrollbox|
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Marioguy1}}<br>
'''Proposer:''' {{User|Marioguy1}}<br>
'''Deadline:''' 24 April, 2011 23:59 GMT
'''Deadline:''' 24 April, 2011 23:59 GMT
Line 42: Line 45:
:::::I type too fast to notice the search bar. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 13:38, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
:::::I type too fast to notice the search bar. --[[User:Reversinator|Reversinator]] 13:38, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
::::::So do I, which is why I initially made that statement about the page being useless. I just discovered it per coincidence after already having finished my comment. It's perfectly possible to miss that search bar thing. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 14:04, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
::::::So do I, which is why I initially made that statement about the page being useless. I just discovered it per coincidence after already having finished my comment. It's perfectly possible to miss that search bar thing. - {{User:Edofenrir/sig}} 14:04, 11 April 2011 (EDT)
Well, obviously that first proposal was made with the mindset "all stubs must die, no matter the consequences". This proposal is going to right that wrong, and, hopefully, not make new stubs. {{User|Marioguy1}}
Well, obviously that first proposal was made with the mindset "all stubs must die, no matter the consequences". This proposal is going to right that wrong, and, hopefully, not make new stubs. {{User|Marioguy1}}}}

Revision as of 22:41, April 24, 2011

Question.svg This talk page or section has a conflict or question that needs to be answered. Please try to help and resolve the issue by leaving a comment.

Fly Assault Game's Boss

It seems really unlikely that the comics would just refer to a boss as "Fly Assault Game's Boss". That's like saying that Mario's name is "Famous Nintendo Character". Hello, I'm Time Turner.

Maybe the author of the manga didn't know Watinga's name. But that hardly counts as a name, one could also say that Watinga was unnamed in the manga. Anyway, I don't have the book, so I can't check it. --Grandy02 17:03, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Split Enemies from Gnat Attack

Template:SettledTPP SPLIT 10-0

The enemies section of this article is not how a usual enemies section should look; it has all enemies within it. These enemies are unique enemies, they have their own quirks, their own methods of destruction, and there is even a boss character in there! All of the enemies in that enemies section should be split out into their own articles; as they are valid enemies, even if they had minor appearances.

I also have here a quote from the coverage policy:

“All content from games in [Mario-related spin-off] series is allowed on the wiki”
MarioWiki:Coverage

These enemies are part of the game, they are content, they are allowed.

Template:Scrollbox