File talk:NSMBW Mushroom Kingdom Desktop Wallpaper.jpg: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Bloc Partier (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m (Mario jc moved page File talk:Nsmbwii mushroomkingdom 1024.jpg to File talk:NSMBW Mushroom Kingdom Desktop Wallpaper.jpg without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is this even official...? I'd like a source. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 17:50, 21 May 2010 (EDT) | Is this even official...? I'd like a source. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 17:50, 21 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
:It's the fourth wallpaper in the extras -> wallpapers section on [http://www.mariobroswii.com/ the game's official site]. The original image has a red "frame" around it to give it wallpaper dimensions, however.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 18:55, 21 May 2010 (EDT) | :It's the fourth wallpaper in the extras -> wallpapers section on [http://www.mariobroswii.com/ the game's official site]. The original image has a red "frame" around it to give it wallpaper dimensions, however.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 18:55, 21 May 2010 (EDT) | ||
::Huh. Well alright then. Didn't know nintendo was getting so cheap-looking... It's shameful, really. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 19:06, 21 May 2010 (EDT) | ::Huh. Well alright then. Didn't know nintendo was getting so cheap-looking... It's shameful, really. {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} 19:06, 21 May 2010 (EDT)<br> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:05, November 27, 2019
Is this even official...? I'd like a source. . 17:50, 21 May 2010 (EDT)
- It's the fourth wallpaper in the extras -> wallpapers section on the game's official site. The original image has a red "frame" around it to give it wallpaper dimensions, however.--vellidragon 18:55, 21 May 2010 (EDT)
- Huh. Well alright then. Didn't know nintendo was getting so cheap-looking... It's shameful, really. . 19:06, 21 May 2010 (EDT)
- Huh. Well alright then. Didn't know nintendo was getting so cheap-looking... It's shameful, really. . 19:06, 21 May 2010 (EDT)
