MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Super Smash Bros.: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: __NOTOC__ ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== {{UNFANOMSTAT |nominated=<!--Sign with FIVE tildes(~) here to put the exact date of the nomination. --> |passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such a...) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (29 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{FA archive notice|unfeature=yes}} | |||
'''Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.''' | |||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (''Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.'') '''I didn't know he uses his sword to attack!''' The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles. | #{{User|LeftyGreenMario}} At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (''Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.'') '''I didn't know he uses his sword to attack!''' The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles. | ||
#{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} Even though Super Smash Bros. is an awesome game with awesome explosion noises and tornadoes, I have to say this is not a very great article. The section Non-playable characters list such characters twice already. And I don't see what's the point of having list of Pokemon in this article when it's already covered in [[Pokémon|this article]] (though it's relatively easy to fix). The rest of the reasons I have, LGM covered it. | |||
#{{user|Coincollector}} - Agree. Some sections repeat the same info (playable chracters, non-playable, etc...). The reception section needs a hand too. | |||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} Unfortuantely, I have to agree with everyone. | |||
#{{User|KS3}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Commander Code-8}} Despite my love for the Smash Bros. series, this just has mess, mess, mess, more mess, and a boring list of pokemon. | |||
#[[User:Luigi=awesome|Luigi=awesome]] Same as above. | |||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
| Line 13: | Line 18: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
I nominated the article at 05:25, 7 May 2010. Can someone add that at the top of the page? {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
:Urgh...{{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
BLOF, I wouldn't want to go to another page just to see the pokemon. They are fine here. All they need, though, is expansion and possibly a rewriting. {{User|LeftyGreenMario}} | |||
:I could just easily copy pasta that information from that article with absolutely no effort at all!!!! :( {{User|BabyLuigiOnFire}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:42, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful unfeature article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. became unfeatured at 15:58, 14 May 2010.
Super Smash Bros.[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
- LeftyGreenMario (talk) At a first glance, this article is a long article with plenty of pictures. At a closer glance, though, there is a slew of grammar errors (I even corrected a few "you's".) Not only that, but the information on each character/pokeball pokemon/stage are vague one-two liners. (Link is a character with medium weight, strength and speed. He uses his sword to attack.) I didn't know he uses his sword to attack! The stages in single-player mode looks really messy too. The article is not very well organized either. The best of what Mario Wiki has to offer? I've seen better articles.
- BabyLuigiOnFire (talk) Even though Super Smash Bros. is an awesome game with awesome explosion noises and tornadoes, I have to say this is not a very great article. The section Non-playable characters list such characters twice already. And I don't see what's the point of having list of Pokemon in this article when it's already covered in this article (though it's relatively easy to fix). The rest of the reasons I have, LGM covered it.
- Coincollector (talk) - Agree. Some sections repeat the same info (playable chracters, non-playable, etc...). The reception section needs a hand too.
- Gamefreak75 (talk) Unfortuantely, I have to agree with everyone.
- KS3 (talk) Per all.
- Commander Code-8 (talk) Despite my love for the Smash Bros. series, this just has mess, mess, mess, more mess, and a boring list of pokemon.
- Luigi=awesome Same as above.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
I nominated the article at 05:25, 7 May 2010. Can someone add that at the top of the page? LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- Urgh...BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
BLOF, I wouldn't want to go to another page just to see the pokemon. They are fine here. All they need, though, is expansion and possibly a rewriting. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- I could just easily copy pasta that information from that article with absolutely no effort at all!!!! :( BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
