Talk:Cap: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: {{PAIRreview |A-rating=3.0 |A-comment=For what information it has, it's correct information. |D-rating=2.5 |D-comment=With an article on something as ambiguous as a cap, you'd expect somet...)
 
(→‎SM64DS: new section)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PAIRreview
:''NOTE: All PAIRreviews have been [[MarioWiki:PAIR#Archive|Archived]].''
|A-rating=3.0
 
|A-comment=For what information it has, it's correct information.
Who asked for this to be PAIRreveiwed? It's way too short for it to become a Featured Article anyway. EDIT: Reversinator, the only articles that need PAIRreviews are the ones that have [[Template:PAIRrequest]] on them. ^_^;; --{{User|Garlic Man}}
|D-rating=2.5
:But the think is, nobody ever asks for PAIRreviews anymore, so I'm just making PAIRreviews for random articles just for fun. Besides, Knife and Cobold both gave me the A-OK for making PAIRreviews, and I'm sure they expected nobody using PAIRrequest. {{User:Reversinator/sig}}
|D-comment=With an article on something as ambiguous as a cap, you'd expect something more... larger. I mean, it says that many characters wear caps, and yet it doesn't even give us a list of all these cap-wearers.
::They gave you the A-OK for making PAIRreviews, or the A-OK for making PAIRreviews on random articles? --{{User|Garlic Man}}
|G-rating=2.0
:::Just to make PAIRreviews, but like I said, Garlicagus, I'm sure they expected nobody using PAIRrequest.{{unsigned|Reversinator}}
|G-comment=Grammatical errors are piled throughout the article.
I just didn't see the use in making PAIRreviews for articles that are too short to ever become FAs in the first place, but do what you must I guess. {{User|Garlic Man}}
|I-rating=2.5
 
|I-comment=Again, for what information the article has, there's enough images to go with the article. I only wish that an image of Goombario's hat itself was used and a gallery of caps was here.
== SM64DS ==
|F-rating=2.5
 
|F-comment=I don't have much to work with. There are little images, so I can't do much here.
Maybe we should have a list of all the caps, with who wears them in each level? Like the Boo that wears Luigi's cap in Big Boo's Haunt? [[User:Jdrawer|Jdrawer]] ([[User talk:Jdrawer|talk]]) 16:44, 20 February 2013 (EST)
|FR-comment=Let's see... needs more images, more expanding, less gramatical errors, and some more finishing touches.
|signature={{User:Reversinator/sig}}}}

Latest revision as of 17:44, February 20, 2013

NOTE: All PAIRreviews have been Archived.

Who asked for this to be PAIRreveiwed? It's way too short for it to become a Featured Article anyway. EDIT: Reversinator, the only articles that need PAIRreviews are the ones that have Template:PAIRrequest on them. ^_^;; --Garlic Man (talk)

But the think is, nobody ever asks for PAIRreviews anymore, so I'm just making PAIRreviews for random articles just for fun. Besides, Knife and Cobold both gave me the A-OK for making PAIRreviews, and I'm sure they expected nobody using PAIRrequest. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
They gave you the A-OK for making PAIRreviews, or the A-OK for making PAIRreviews on random articles? --Garlic Man (talk)
Just to make PAIRreviews, but like I said, Garlicagus, I'm sure they expected nobody using PAIRrequest.
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Reversinator (talk).

I just didn't see the use in making PAIRreviews for articles that are too short to ever become FAs in the first place, but do what you must I guess. Garlic Man (talk)

SM64DS[edit]

Maybe we should have a list of all the caps, with who wears them in each level? Like the Boo that wears Luigi's cap in Big Boo's Haunt? Jdrawer (talk) 16:44, 20 February 2013 (EST)