Talk:Candy Clone: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Metalex123 (talk | contribs) (→Kong?) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Is the name official, or is it a conjecture? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:46, 30 May 2007 (EDT) | Is the name official, or is it a conjecture? - {{User:Cobold/sig}} 16:46, 30 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:According to [[I Spy with My Hairy Eye]], it's simply called Candy Clone. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | :According to [[I Spy with My Hairy Eye]], it's simply called Candy Clone. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
I don't think we need a proposal to settle this, but do you guys think we should just merge this to [[Candy Kong]], the same way we did with [[Leo Luster]] and [[Bluster Kong]]?--{{User|Knife}} 19:18, 9 February 2011 (EST) | |||
:I agree. {{User:Supremo78/sig}} | |||
If that's all, I think I'll just go ahead with the merge unless someone opposes. This is one of those "speak now or forever hold your peace" moments.--{{User|Knife}} 19:30, 11 February 2011 (EST) | |||
==Kong?== | |||
Why is the Candy Clone in the Kong section? It's a robot, not a Kong. --[[User:Metalex123|Metalex123]] ([[User talk:Metalex123|talk]]) 21:50, 10 May 2014 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:50, May 10, 2014
Is the name official, or is it a conjecture? - Cobold (talk · contribs) 16:46, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
- According to I Spy with My Hairy Eye, it's simply called Candy Clone. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
I don't think we need a proposal to settle this, but do you guys think we should just merge this to Candy Kong, the same way we did with Leo Luster and Bluster Kong?--Knife (talk) 19:18, 9 February 2011 (EST)
If that's all, I think I'll just go ahead with the merge unless someone opposes. This is one of those "speak now or forever hold your peace" moments.--Knife (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2011 (EST)
Kong?[edit]
Why is the Candy Clone in the Kong section? It's a robot, not a Kong. --Metalex123 (talk) 21:50, 10 May 2014 (EDT)
