Talk:Big Top: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Time Turner (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Not sure about that. They always appear together, so wouldn't the History sections become redundant since they'd mostly tell the same? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 10:41, 21 December 2009 (EST) | :Not sure about that. They always appear together, so wouldn't the History sections become redundant since they'd mostly tell the same? --[[User:Grandy02|Grandy02]] 10:41, 21 December 2009 (EST) | ||
::Not necessarily, if written correctly. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ::Not necessarily, if written correctly. {{User:Reversinator/sig}} | ||
== Species == | |||
I mean, now we have the Bonneters. I think it should be at least in the trivia that he resembles a Bonneter [[User:Magma.|Magma.]] ([[User talk:Magma.|talk]]) 23:26, July 20, 2019 (EDT) | |||
:"They're sentient hats" would be considered a flimsy premise, unfortunately. --{{User:Lord Grammaticus/sig}} 23:29, July 20, 2019 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 22:29, July 20, 2019
Separate article?[edit]
I wonder, why does this character have a separate article when even Ashley and Red are in one article? Is Big Top ever seen without Ballyhoo? --Grandy02 10:21, 21 December 2009 (EST)
This is why I want to split Ashley and Red. And Dribble and Spitz. And Kat and Ana. They're seperate characters, so they deserve seperate articles.Hello, I'm Time Turner.
- Not sure about that. They always appear together, so wouldn't the History sections become redundant since they'd mostly tell the same? --Grandy02 10:41, 21 December 2009 (EST)
- Not necessarily, if written correctly. Hello, I'm Time Turner.
Species[edit]
I mean, now we have the Bonneters. I think it should be at least in the trivia that he resembles a Bonneter Magma. (talk) 23:26, July 20, 2019 (EDT)
