MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Mario Galaxy: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(27 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:59, 1 July 2009 (EDT)|passed=10:51, 10 July 2009 (EDT)}}
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
|nominated=17:58, 1 July 2009 (EDT)
|passed=03:36, 6 July 2009
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
#{{User|Super Mario Bros.}} Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
Line 15: Line 11:
#{{User|Gamer2.1}} I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
#{{User|Gamer2.1}} I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
#{{User|SpriteYoshi}}per all
#{{User|SpriteYoshi}}per all
#{{User|Doopliss rocks}} Great page, & love the game.


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Too little information. The soundtrack section sucks (writtin by me because there was none) The enemie section is bad cause "red flying bug" sounds totally unsophisticated for a FA. Finally the prankster comet section was quite confusing to read. The main thing was I didn't know if they disappear or not if you shut down the game.
{{User:Booderdash/sig|not really good}}


==== Removal of Opposes ====
==== Removal of Opposes ====

Latest revision as of 16:42, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Mario Galaxy was nominated to be a featured article at 17:59, 1 July 2009 (EDT) and passed at 09:51, 17 July 2009.


Super Mario Galaxy

Support

  1. Super Mario Bros. (talk) Meets the requirements for F.A. It is very in-depth and descriptive, it is well written, it cites its sources, it doesn't have any rewrite tags or the such, etc.
  2. McQueenMario (talk) Per Super Mario Bros.
  3. YellowYoshi127 (talk) Yoshi! Yes, it does meet the requirements and yes, it is a great page. (Been on it millions)
  4. This...game...IS SO EPIC!!!Stick2012 15:51, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
  5. I agree, well-written but a couple too many lists for my liking, but still Marioguy1 (talk)
  6. RPGCRAZIEE (talk) This article is just as the game, great! It has very good information.
  7. Gamer2.1 (talk) I agree with everyone above of this message this should be a featured artical.
  8. SpriteYoshi (talk)per all
  9. Doopliss rocks (talk) Great page, & love the game.

Oppose

Removal of Opposes

Comments

Okay, to get more in depth about the qualifications. Super Mario Galaxy is a well written, descriptive, un-biased, and detailed article, going into depth about the game and is not tagged with any improvement tags. It has good quality images, to the extent that a few of them are featured images themselves and a couple of others are/were nominated. It has citations where needed, and the beggining of the article is a good detailed lead that would look good on the Main Page. If I am correct, it has no (and if I'm wrong, very few) redlinks covering the page. It, overall, is a quality article and deserves to be featured. Super Mario Bros. (talk)

  1. This is probably the best article currently nominated for FA right now.SpriteYoshi (talk)
Retrieved from "https://www.mariowiki.com/index.php?title=MarioWiki:Featured_articles/N1/Super_Mario_Galaxy&oldid=4237865"