MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Kolorado: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Support: fixing page)
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FA archive notice|nominated=09:55, 22 December 2008 (EST)|passed=13:03, 23 December 2008 (EST)}}
|nominated=09:55, 22 December 2008
|passed=<!--WHEN IT IS AT LEAST 5/0, PUT TIME OF 5TH SUPPORT OR REMOVAL OF LAST OPPOSE IN SAME FORMAT-->
}}
 
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
# I think that it should be an FA. I is long for a character being in one game and very detailed.
# I think that it should be an FA. I is long for a character being in one game and very detailed. {{unsigned|RedBoo64}}
# YESH, Kolorado is cool, old bean. <span style="color:steelblue">[[User:Master Hand|Alex25,]] [[User talk:Master Hand|Aluigi,]] [[Special:Contributions/Master Hand|Master Hand,]] [[Special:Editcount/Master Hand|Whatever.]]</span> 12:00, 22 December 2008 (EST)
# YESH, Kolorado is cool, old bean. <span style="color:steelblue">[[User:Master Hand|Alex25,]] [[User talk:Master Hand|Aluigi,]] [[Special:Contributions/Master Hand|Master Hand,]] [[Special:Editcount/Master Hand|Whatever.]]</span> 12:00, 22 December 2008 (EST)
#Quite a bit of information for a one-game, character, wot wot. By my grandfather's marmalade, I wonder how many buttered scots could fit into this vast space, eh old bean? {{User:Daniel Webster/Miniature}} 12:17, 23 December 2008 (EST)
# Per all. {{User:Beanbean/sig}} 12:23, 23 December 2008 (EST)
#GROOVY! But, seriously, good job, Plums.- {{User:Bloc Partier/sig}}
#Lots of images and tons of detail. A great article, especially for a character that only appeared in one game! {{User:The Gravitator/sig}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
#<s>{{User:Bloc Partier/sig}} - According to the official FA nomination thingy, an article must "…have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box." This page has no lead and jumps right into the story of Kolorado. So a lead would be nice. ;)</s>


==== Comments ====
==== Comments ====
 
There are only two images quite at the top of the page. No pics in the huge part below. I think this needs to be changed (though I don't want to oppose for this). {{User:Time Q/sig}} 13:20, 23 December 2008 (EST)
==Oppose==
==Comments==

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Kolorado was nominated to be a featured article at 09:55, 22 December 2008 (EST) and passed at 13:03, 30 December 2008.


Kolorado

Support

  1. I think that it should be an FA. I is long for a character being in one game and very detailed.
    The preceding unsigned comment was added by RedBoo64 (talk).
  2. YESH, Kolorado is cool, old bean. Alex25, Aluigi, Master Hand, Whatever. 12:00, 22 December 2008 (EST)
  3. Quite a bit of information for a one-game, character, wot wot. By my grandfather's marmalade, I wonder how many buttered scots could fit into this vast space, eh old bean? Tadaa!2.gifPlumberTadaaa!.gif 12:17, 23 December 2008 (EST)
  4. Per all. f_wikiimagem_a663437.pngBean 12:23, 23 December 2008 (EST)
  5. GROOVY! But, seriously, good job, Plums.- BLOC PARTIER.
  6. Lots of images and tons of detail. A great article, especially for a character that only appeared in one game! TheGravitator2.gif Gravitator rules!

Oppose

  1. BLOC PARTIER. - According to the official FA nomination thingy, an article must "…have a proper lead that gives a good summary of the topic and can be used for the front page featured box." This page has no lead and jumps right into the story of Kolorado. So a lead would be nice. ;)

Comments

There are only two images quite at the top of the page. No pics in the huge part below. I think this needs to be changed (though I don't want to oppose for this). Time Questions 13:20, 23 December 2008 (EST)