MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FA archive notice|nominated=17:24, 16 September 2008 (EDT)|passed=09:42, 11 October 2008 (EDT)}}
|nominated=17:24, 16 September 2008
|passed=<!--WHEN IT IS AT LEAST 5/0, PUT TIME OF 5TH SUPPORT OR REMOVAL OF LAST OPPOSE IN SAME FORMAT-->
}}
 
===[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]===
===[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]===
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
Line 10: Line 6:
#{{User:Jaffffey/sig}} - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki.
#{{User:Jaffffey/sig}} - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki.
#{{User:Magitroopa/sig}} - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
#{{User:Magitroopa/sig}} - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
#{{user:tanokki/sig}} A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy.
#{{user|Luigi001}} It's ideal for an FA, so per all!
#{{User|Steam5}} The Best Super Smash Bros. Series Game Ever!


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====
Line 17: Line 16:


I guess this is a bit of a ''de facto'' oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.{{User:Phoenix Rider/sig}} 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
I guess this is a bit of a ''de facto'' oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.{{User:Phoenix Rider/sig}} 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
I won't agree to this being featured until I've done a certain major edit. After that, it will be fine as a FA, I guess.{{User:Dom/sig}}
:You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. {{User:Time Q/sig}} 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
::I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. {{User:Dom/sig}}
:::Actually it would be best if you did oppose. 'cause otherwise the article is gonna be featured when it's not actually fine yet. (I didn't read it, so I cannot say anything about its quality) {{User:Time Q/sig}} 09:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 16:41, May 31, 2024

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Super Smash Bros. Brawl was nominated to be a featured article at 17:24, 16 September 2008 (EDT) and passed at 08:42, 18 October 2008.


Super Smash Bros. Brawl

Support

  1. Marcelagus (TCE) - It's a long article, so I tried my best to find POV and other grammatical mistakes, and as I see it, it looks great. (And it does pass the 4,000 Characters rule)
  2. MisterJaffffeyPeteyPiranhaBanana.gif G0 Featured articles/N1/Super Smash Bros. Brawl - This is probably one of the longest (and most complete) game articles on the wiki.
  3. Storm Warrior - Looks like a well written article, despite being a bit long.
  4. user:tanokki [1]F ThatsMamaLum fb9046e.gif A long written article, lot's of info and no extra stuff! Definitively worthy.
  5. Luigi001 (talk) It's ideal for an FA, so per all!
  6. Steam5 (talk) The Best Super Smash Bros. Series Game Ever!

Oppose

Comments

  1. I must say I'm very apprehensive about this one. Skimming through it, the Gameplay section needs work, as does a lot of the SSE Story section. The tables, especially for the stages, need work.

I guess this is a bit of a de facto oppose, but I can certainly see this becoming FA material.Phoenix Rider 17:30, 16 September 2008 (EDT)

I won't agree to this being featured until I've done a certain major edit. After that, it will be fine as a FA, I guess.th_DimentioSigLeft.png Dom »» McTalk th_SMKDimentiobyStooben.png

You may want to oppose the nomination, since it has met FA requirements. If not opposed, it will be featured on October 18. Time Questions 02:06, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
I'm not gonna oppose. But my major edit will be done after October 18th (I'm busy), and then I will personally approve of the article's quality. th_DimentioSigLeft.png Dom »» McTalk th_SMKDimentiobyStooben.png
Actually it would be best if you did oppose. 'cause otherwise the article is gonna be featured when it's not actually fine yet. (I didn't read it, so I cannot say anything about its quality) Time Questions 09:56, 15 October 2008 (EDT)