File talk:MSSParagomba.PNG: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: :where did you find this? ~~~)
 
m (Resolved.)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
:where did you find this? {{User:King Mario/sig}}
:where did you find this? {{User:King Mario/sig}}
==Reverting==
So not to start an edit war about this, why exactly was my transparent version reverted to the non-transparent one? It's not the "pixelated" version that was reverted before, I actually spent about an hour cleaning up the edges, and the person reverting my upload gave no reason at all.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
Ask {{User|YoshiGo99}}. {{User:Mario & Luigi/sig}}
I put this in the file talk page in case I'm missing any universally obvious reason here that said YoshiGo99 had to revert my upload; the fact that they gave no reason at all seems to imply that there is one. If not, they should have put one in the summary or left it intact.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:08, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
:There was a related proposal a month or two ago dealing with transparency, but its only decision was to remove transparency if it ruined the image, so I don't think there's a universal reason for that. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}
::If it's "ruined", I would like to see a reason for that, as there's no obvious, unmissable "ruining" going on here from what I can see. If nobody can provide a reason, I would like to revert it back to the transparent version, as YoshiGo99's revert is hardly justifiable without one.--[[User:Vellidragon|vellidragon]] 17:21, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
:::I thought it was fine, and no worse than any of the previous revisions, but I usually don't work on images, so I'm not the best judge of that. I think that since there was no reason for the revert, we should use the transparent version. {{User:Bop1996/sig}}

Latest revision as of 05:24, October 3, 2012

where did you find this? King Mario f_KMThumbm_38614a2.png

Reverting[edit]

So not to start an edit war about this, why exactly was my transparent version reverted to the non-transparent one? It's not the "pixelated" version that was reverted before, I actually spent about an hour cleaning up the edges, and the person reverting my upload gave no reason at all.--vellidragon 17:01, 7 October 2011 (EDT)

Ask YoshiGo99 (talk). PikaSamus (talk)

I put this in the file talk page in case I'm missing any universally obvious reason here that said YoshiGo99 had to revert my upload; the fact that they gave no reason at all seems to imply that there is one. If not, they should have put one in the summary or left it intact.--vellidragon 17:08, 7 October 2011 (EDT)

There was a related proposal a month or two ago dealing with transparency, but its only decision was to remove transparency if it ruined the image, so I don't think there's a universal reason for that. Bop1996 (Talk)
If it's "ruined", I would like to see a reason for that, as there's no obvious, unmissable "ruining" going on here from what I can see. If nobody can provide a reason, I would like to revert it back to the transparent version, as YoshiGo99's revert is hardly justifiable without one.--vellidragon 17:21, 7 October 2011 (EDT)
I thought it was fine, and no worse than any of the previous revisions, but I usually don't work on images, so I'm not the best judge of that. I think that since there was no reason for the revert, we should use the transparent version. Bop1996 (Talk)