Talk:Game & Watch: Manhole (minigame): Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "([Pp]roposal|[Ss]ettled)(Outcome|TPP)" to "$1 $2") |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Merge? == | == Merge? == | ||
Should this article be merged with [[Manhole (Game & Watch)|''Manhole'' (Game & Watch)]]? There doesn't seem to be anything that differentiates this particular instance of ''Manhole'' as a minigame from its appearances in the ''Game & Watch Gallery'' series. [[User:JanMisali|JanMisali]] ([[User talk:JanMisali|talk]]) 12:22, January 8, 2024 (EST) | Should this article be merged with [[Manhole (Game & Watch)|''Manhole'' (Game & Watch)]]? There doesn't seem to be anything that differentiates this particular instance of ''Manhole'' as a minigame from its appearances in the ''Game & Watch Gallery'' series. [[User:JanMisali|JanMisali]] ([[User talk:JanMisali|talk]]) 12:22, January 8, 2024 (EST) | ||
== Merge with "''Manhole'' (Game & Watch)" == | |||
{{Settled TPP}} | |||
{{Proposal outcome|passed|5-0|merge}} | |||
Might as well just make this a formal talk-page proposal. The main article about [[Manhole (Game & Watch)|''Manhole'']] is ''already'' an article about that game's uses as a minigame, as it has been ever since this wiki narrowed the scope of how it covers Game & Watch games. What reason is there for there to be a separate, shorter article that exclusively covers its use as a minigame in ''WarioWare Gold''? Surely this information would be better suited on the main ''Manhole'' article, right? | |||
'''Proposer''': {{User|JanMisali}}<br> | |||
'''Deadline''': April 9, 2024, 23:59 GMT | |||
==== Merge ==== | |||
#{{User|JanMisali}} Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|Camwoodstock}} From the looks of things, unlike something like, say, [[Sheriff (microgame)|Sheriff]] or [[Dr. Wario]] from ''MMG'', this version of Manhole has practically nothing uniquely Wario to it; it's ''just'' Manhole. It's also worth noting that the [[Pyoro (minigame)|Pyoro]] souvenir got merged to its ''MMG'' incarnation since it is basically unaltered. We think a merge in this case makes sense--unless it turns out there's like, a super-duper secret Wario cameo at 500 points that's not covered on the article, we can probably merge this for the same logic as the Pyoro merge. | |||
#{{User|Super Mario RPG}} Per proposer. | |||
#{{User|SolemnStormcloud}} Per proposal. | |||
#{{User|ThePowerPlayer}} They are exactly the same. | |||
==== Keep the articles separate ==== | |||
==== Comments ==== | |||
Latest revision as of 15:33, May 31, 2024
Merge?[edit]
Should this article be merged with Manhole (Game & Watch)? There doesn't seem to be anything that differentiates this particular instance of Manhole as a minigame from its appearances in the Game & Watch Gallery series. JanMisali (talk) 12:22, January 8, 2024 (EST)
Merge with "Manhole (Game & Watch)"[edit]
|
This talk page proposal has already been settled. Please do not edit any of the sections in the proposal. If you wish to discuss the article, do so in a new header below the proposal. |
merge 5-0
Might as well just make this a formal talk-page proposal. The main article about Manhole is already an article about that game's uses as a minigame, as it has been ever since this wiki narrowed the scope of how it covers Game & Watch games. What reason is there for there to be a separate, shorter article that exclusively covers its use as a minigame in WarioWare Gold? Surely this information would be better suited on the main Manhole article, right?
Proposer: JanMisali (talk)
Deadline: April 9, 2024, 23:59 GMT
Merge[edit]
- JanMisali (talk) Per proposal.
- Camwoodstock (talk) From the looks of things, unlike something like, say, Sheriff or Dr. Wario from MMG, this version of Manhole has practically nothing uniquely Wario to it; it's just Manhole. It's also worth noting that the Pyoro souvenir got merged to its MMG incarnation since it is basically unaltered. We think a merge in this case makes sense--unless it turns out there's like, a super-duper secret Wario cameo at 500 points that's not covered on the article, we can probably merge this for the same logic as the Pyoro merge.
- Super Mario RPG (talk) Per proposer.
- SolemnStormcloud (talk) Per proposal.
- ThePowerPlayer (talk) They are exactly the same.
