Talk:Magon: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Waluigi Time (talk | contribs) (→Split?: resolved, proposal passed but not yet enacted) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This article is written bad {{user:crypt Raider/sig}} | This article is written bad {{user:crypt Raider/sig}} | ||
If you think an article is bad, you should edit instead of complaining and if you do complain, explain how it is written bad.{{User:Knife/sig}} 13:29, 7 January 2008 (EST) | |||
==Split?== | |||
While the Magon (and Cractyl, Ankiron, and Clubosaur) variants share the same enemy formula, the guides otherwise treat them as separate, "new" enemies. Should they be split? It would be sensical to apply more page categories only after splitting. However, it seems only the Ankiron derivatives share some different attributes that somewhat affect how they're fought instead of just making it incrementally faster, and aside from that, the Magon derivatives would be complicated to split due to having separate Japanese names for two sizes and lacking a sourced English name for the Mirror Mansion variant. Does anyone else have thoughts on it? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 23:34, April 7, 2020 (EDT) | |||
:I've personally been wanting these split, now that a majority have sourced names, it'd be good to. Besides, current setup's awkward for species categorization. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 23:45, April 7, 2020 (EDT) | |||
::I agree with a split. The Japanese names are unsourced, so I wouldn't worry about them too much. {{User:7feetunder/sig}} 22:52, May 10, 2020 (EDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 11:35, August 26, 2020
If you think an article is bad, you should edit instead of complaining and if you do complain, explain how it is written bad.Knife (talk) 13:29, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Split?[edit]
While the Magon (and Cractyl, Ankiron, and Clubosaur) variants share the same enemy formula, the guides otherwise treat them as separate, "new" enemies. Should they be split? It would be sensical to apply more page categories only after splitting. However, it seems only the Ankiron derivatives share some different attributes that somewhat affect how they're fought instead of just making it incrementally faster, and aside from that, the Magon derivatives would be complicated to split due to having separate Japanese names for two sizes and lacking a sourced English name for the Mirror Mansion variant. Does anyone else have thoughts on it? LinkTheLefty (talk) 23:34, April 7, 2020 (EDT)
- I've personally been wanting these split, now that a majority have sourced names, it'd be good to. Besides, current setup's awkward for species categorization. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 23:45, April 7, 2020 (EDT)
- I agree with a split. The Japanese names are unsourced, so I wouldn't worry about them too much.
22:52, May 10, 2020 (EDT)
- I agree with a split. The Japanese names are unsourced, so I wouldn't worry about them too much.
