MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Mario Party: The Top 100: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (→Support) |
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{fa-archive +{{FA archive notice)) |
||
| (22 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice | ||
|nominated=19:31, 28 November 2017 | |nominated=19:31, 28 November 2017 | ||
|passed= | |passed=20:42, 28 November 2017 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
#{{User|YoshiStar28}} | #{{User|YoshiStar28}} | ||
#{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} Yeah, I agree. Another article that sets the standards for video game articles on this wiki! Basically, '''''everything I said on the Star Rush featured article page applies here, too.''''' Per all. | #{{User|Owencrazyboy9}} Yeah, I agree. Another article that sets the standards for video game articles on this wiki! Basically, '''''everything I said on the Star Rush featured article page applies here, too.''''' Per all. | ||
#{{User|Astro-Lanceur}} Baby Luigi is doing '''GREAT''' work on this article. per all. | |||
#{{User|Courtney}} Keep up the great work. I love the article! | |||
#{{User|Toadette the Achiever}} I have to say, I'm impressed with the article. Per all. | |||
#{{User|Lcrossmk8}} This looks like a good article, so yeah, I'll put my vote in for this one. Per all. | |||
#{{User|LuigiMaster123}} Kudos to Baby Luigi for doing all this work! Per all. | |||
#{{User|TheFlameChomp}} Per all. | |||
#{{User|Marioguy}} This article is becoming more incredible everytime I see it! Per all. | |||
#{{User|Flappy Bird}} Sure, why not? | |||
#{{User|Whitey}} This article is very well-written and informative, especially for a game that was only released recently. Per all. | |||
#{{User|A51 Trooper}} Per Whitey's reasoning. | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
| Line 15: | Line 25: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
"Other people also do it" is a bad reason to support anything. What do you have to say about the policy that I linked to? {{User:Time Turner/sig}} 21:37, 28 November 2017 (EST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:46, May 31, 2024
Mario Party: The Top 100
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Mario Party: The Top 100 was nominated to be a featured article at 19:31, 28 November 2017 and passed at 15:42, 5 December 2017.
Support
- Baby Luigi (talk) I have written as much information as I could on this article, detailing everything that needs to be said about the game, writing about all the collection aspects, the board features from Minigame Match, and filling out red links to articles (like the Worlds in Minigame Island). I think the presentation of the article is close to matching Mario Party: Star Rush in terms of organization and the amount of content that is in the game and thus, I think this article is ready to be featured. If there any more improvements that could be made to the article, please let me know.
- YoshiStar28 (talk)
- Owencrazyboy9 (talk) Yeah, I agree. Another article that sets the standards for video game articles on this wiki! Basically, everything I said on the Star Rush featured article page applies here, too. Per all.
- Astro-Lanceur (talk) Baby Luigi is doing GREAT work on this article. per all.
- Courtney (talk) Keep up the great work. I love the article!
- Toadette the Achiever (talk) I have to say, I'm impressed with the article. Per all.
- Lcrossmk8 (talk) This looks like a good article, so yeah, I'll put my vote in for this one. Per all.
- LuigiMaster123 (talk) Kudos to Baby Luigi for doing all this work! Per all.
- TheFlameChomp (talk) Per all.
- Marioguy (talk) This article is becoming more incredible everytime I see it! Per all.
- Flappy Bird (talk) Sure, why not?
- Whitey (talk) This article is very well-written and informative, especially for a game that was only released recently. Per all.
- A51 Trooper (talk) Per Whitey's reasoning.
Oppose
Removal of opposes
Comments
"Other people also do it" is a bad reason to support anything. What do you have to say about the policy that I linked to? Hello, I'm Time Turner. 21:37, 28 November 2017 (EST)
