MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Kart 8: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(→‎Comments: Removing redundant category)
 
(15 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FANOMFAIL
|nominated=03:02 27 February 2015
|nominated=03:02, 27 February 2015
|passed=<!--When it is 5-0, put the time (such as 12:10, 11 December 2012) of the fifth support/removal of last oppose by copying it from the history of the page.-->
|lastedit=03:02, 29 March 2015
}}
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|The Mario Gamer}}: Decent article, great game, and expanded descriptions. While I need to work on the karts, the article itself is strong, sufficient, and descriptive.
#{{User|The Mario Gamer}}: Decent article, great game, and expanded descriptions. While I need to work on the karts, the article itself is strong, sufficient, and descriptive.
#{{User|Jacob Lott}}
#{{User|Jacob Lott}}
#{{User|Mushroom Koop}}: I don't have a Wii U, but this game and [[Super Mario 3D World]] made me wanna buy one! [[Baby Mario|All]] [[Baby Luigi|the]] [[Baby Peach|ba]][[Baby Daisy|bi]][[Baby Rosalina|es]], [[Toadette]] and [[Waluigi]] make a comeback! Not only that, but the [[Koopalings]] are playable!
#{{User|SuperMarioBros}}
#{{User|LegoMarioBros}}


==== Oppose ====
==== Oppose ====

Latest revision as of 16:05, February 9, 2017

Mario Kart 8[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. The Mario Gamer (talk): Decent article, great game, and expanded descriptions. While I need to work on the karts, the article itself is strong, sufficient, and descriptive.
  2. Jacob Lott (talk)
  3. SuperMarioBros (talk)
  4. LegoMarioBros (talk)

Oppose[edit]

  1. Time Turner (talk) Some problems brought up previously, like the lacking gameplay section, the sloppy controls section, and the vague "other" section for characters, have not been settled. Also, the game's quality has nothing to do with the article's quality, and bringing it up is meaningless.
  2. BabyLuigi64 (talk) Per the issues addressed here that have not since been fixed, and per Time Turner.
  3. Boo4761 (talk) Per Time Turner.
  4. Thejfh1999 (talk) Per Time Turner.
  5. Burningdragon25 (talk) Per all.

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]