MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Vivian: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice}} | ||
'''Vivian became a featured article at 13:49, 20 May 2014.''' | '''Vivian became a featured article at 13:49, 20 May 2014.''' | ||
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
i think that the hooktail line might also be in the Japan version but i can't check becasue there are no Japan walktought of the game you are calling vivain a man in the Japan versionm when the only proof is not of the Japan version {{User|Grand Master Gamer}} | i think that the hooktail line might also be in the Japan version but i can't check becasue there are no Japan walktought of the game you are calling vivain a man in the Japan versionm when the only proof is not of the Japan version {{User|Grand Master Gamer}} | ||
Latest revision as of 16:39, May 31, 2024
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Vivian became a featured article at 13:49, 20 May 2014.
Vivian[edit]
Support[edit]
- DaisyLuigi (talk) This article is very well written. It includes well-written history, a great foreign language template, and the pictures are a good size, and have reasonable captions. Overall, it's a great article that is very popular in Paper Mario: The Thousand Year Door, where she is a main character, so I support.
- Ashley and Red (talk)
- Fluffy_Bluff_Galaxy (talk)
- Tails777 (talk)
- Fandro (talk)
- Misty (talk)
Oppose[edit]
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Having "a few things that need to be fixed" is dealbreaker for me. If they were fixed, I'd support. But for now, I'm not voting. 
Bluetoad63
11:27, 11 April 2014 (EDT)
Okay. I will fix some of the bad edits.
The edits are fixed! It looks better now.
- You did one tiny edit, that hardly counts as fixing the problems. Yoshi876 (talk)
- I'll do more. It's such a great article though, and there isn't much more to edit.
I suggest to trin her "Gender" section...and delete some refsUser:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig
- Okay, then will you support?
- Yes, I am OK with it now. User:Ashley anEoTselkie/sig
- Removing perfectly good information is a horrible way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - Walkazo 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT)
- Thanks for clearing that up, I wasn't sure.
- Removing perfectly good information is a horrible way to go about "improving" a page. The gender stuff is important and interesting, and at only two paragraphs,it's not too large at all, it's just thorough, which is a good thing. And if anything, the extensive references are one of the page's strengths: citations give the wiki credibility and make us more professional-grade, and in this case in particular, having hard video proof and our own original translation work stops people from baselessly trying to white-wash the gender stuff, since we can say "uh, no, it's real, leave it alone". - Walkazo 20:33, 16 April 2014 (EDT)
it is nice but they still need to fix the mistke for the Japan part of the page other then that it's 90 - of 100
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grand Master Gamer (talk).
- @Grand Master Gamer, What exactly do you mean by "The Japanese Part"? Do you mean the names in different languages?
i mean that the gander part at the end of the japan version Gommbella said that vivian was 100% female and that bedam was being a bully how can any one take Beldum that is a bully as canon she was bullying vivian and Goombella toke it the worng way all so goomebella is not all that reliable because she called a person by gender base on what other people side also she called hooktail a guy just becasue the othe people called him a dude but it run's out that hooktail is a she when gloom tail she you killed my little sister right after they said hooks tail name also goomebella did not change her info so if she caN make a mistake on someone gender then why could she not mistake Vivain gender as well
The preceding unsigned comment was added by Grand Master Gamer (talk).
- Hooktail being referred as a male is more likely a mistake on the game's part rather than Goombella's being wrong.
- As 'kazo said, "Beldam calling Vivian a boy was [..] meant to be taken literally", so it's not just an insult to Vivian's femininity, it's to mock Vivian's identification with femininity.
- To be frank, it's a chore to read your posts, so if I'm making the wrong argument, I'm interpreting your writing rather than reading it, and it's a lot of effort..
It's me, Mario! (Talk / Stalk) 00:05, 10 May 2014 (EDT)
i think that the hooktail line might also be in the Japan version but i can't check becasue there are no Japan walktought of the game you are calling vivain a man in the Japan versionm when the only proof is not of the Japan version Grand Master Gamer (talk)
