MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Mario Party 9: Difference between revisions

From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice")
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]===
===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]===
{{FANOMSTAT
{{FA archive notice}}
|nominated= 18:06, February 16, 2014
'''Mario Party 9''' became a featured article at 19:09, 24 February 2014.
|passed=19:09, 17 February 2014 (EST)
}}
==== Support ====
==== Support ====
#{{User|Yoshi K}} The last time this article was nominated, it was in very good condition (and probably good enough to be featured), but failed because of an oppose that didn't get removed due to time constraints. I looked this article over twice and thought it should be featured. There are no red links or templates, it is well-written, the trivia section is at a reasonable length and the article isn't too short. I'm certain it should be featured.
#{{User|Yoshi K}} The last time this article was nominated, it was in very good condition (and probably good enough to be featured), but failed because of an oppose that didn't get removed due to time constraints. I looked this article over twice and thought it should be featured. There are no red links or templates, it is well-written, the trivia section is at a reasonable length and the article isn't too short. I'm certain it should be featured.

Latest revision as of 16:40, May 31, 2024

Mario Party 9[edit]

Smg2 icon bronzestar.png

This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.


Mario Party 9 became a featured article at 19:09, 24 February 2014.

Support[edit]

  1. Yoshi K (talk) The last time this article was nominated, it was in very good condition (and probably good enough to be featured), but failed because of an oppose that didn't get removed due to time constraints. I looked this article over twice and thought it should be featured. There are no red links or templates, it is well-written, the trivia section is at a reasonable length and the article isn't too short. I'm certain it should be featured.
  2. Baby Luigi (talk)
  3. Randombob-omb4761 (talk)
  4. Mario (talk)
  5. Ashley and Red (talk)
  6. Fandro (talk)
  7. Daisyluva99 (talk)
  8. World10 (talk)
  9. Icemario (talk)

Oppose[edit]

Removal of Opposes[edit]

Comments[edit]