MarioWiki:Featured articles/Unfeature/N1/Rawk Hawk: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (All unfeature votes need a reason) |
|||
| (19 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{ | ===[[{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{UNFANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated=18:57, 17 February 2014 (EST) | |nominated=18:57, 17 February 2014 (EST) | ||
| | |lastedit=21:40, 20 January 2014 | ||
}} | }} | ||
==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Remove Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User|Ashley and Red}}The article looks good, but there is a rule that says that articles must be in present tense, this one is in past. | <s>#{{User|Ashley and Red}}The article looks good, but there is a rule that says that articles must be in present tense, this one is in past.</s> | ||
==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ==== Keep Featured Article Status ==== | ||
#{{User| | #{{User|Yoshi876}} Problems are now fixed. | ||
#{{User|Epic Rosalina}} I rewrote the article and removed "after that." | |||
==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ==== Removal of Support/Oppose Votes ==== | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
If you do that I will remove my support{{User|Ashley and Red}} | If you do that I will remove my support{{User|Ashley and Red}} | ||
I fixed it, but could someone try removing several instances where "after that" is used? {{User|Demonic KB}} | |||
::You can use this expression when saying things that hapened ''after''the last one. Ah and my support slashed {{User|Ashley and Red}} | |||
Well, the history section seems a bit... ahem... ''beefy''. You know, that 17 paragraph essay on Baby Luigi's ''Partners in Time'' article? Does this fall under the same category? {{User|Mario}} | |||
Epic Rosalina, you can cut out more. I'll try cutting the history section even more. {{User|Mario}} | |||
Latest revision as of 16:24, February 9, 2017
Rawk Hawk[edit]
Remove Featured Article Status[edit]
#Ashley and Red (talk)The article looks good, but there is a rule that says that articles must be in present tense, this one is in past.
Keep Featured Article Status[edit]
- Yoshi876 (talk) Problems are now fixed.
- Epic Rosalina (talk) I rewrote the article and removed "after that."
Removal of Support/Oppose Votes[edit]
Comments[edit]
If you do that I will remove my supportAshley and Red (talk)
I fixed it, but could someone try removing several instances where "after that" is used? Demonic KB (talk)
- You can use this expression when saying things that hapened afterthe last one. Ah and my support slashed Ashley and Red (talk)
Well, the history section seems a bit... ahem... beefy. You know, that 17 paragraph essay on Baby Luigi's Partners in Time article? Does this fall under the same category? Mario (talk)
Epic Rosalina, you can cut out more. I'll try cutting the history section even more. Mario (talk)
