MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (L151 moved page MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy to MarioWiki:Featured Articles/N1/Clockwork Ruins Galaxy without leaving a redirect: archive) |
m (Text replacement - "{{[Ff]a-archive" to "{{FA archive notice") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[Clockwork Ruins Galaxy]]=== | ===[[Clockwork Ruins Galaxy]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FA archive notice|nominated=22:50, 25 October 2010 (EDT)|passed=13:05, 3 November 2010 (EDT)}} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Gamefreak75}} - I, along with others, worked very hard on this article. It is very well written and comes complete with plenty of pictures. | #{{User|Gamefreak75}} - I, along with others, worked very hard on this article. It is very well written and comes complete with plenty of pictures. | ||
Latest revision as of 16:39, May 31, 2024
Clockwork Ruins Galaxy
This is an archive of a successful featured article nomination. If this page is unprotected, do not modify its contents, as it is an archive of past discussions.
Clockwork Ruins Galaxy was nominated to be a featured article at 22:50, 25 October 2010 (EDT) and passed at 12:05, 10 November 2010.
Support
- Gamefreak75 (talk) - I, along with others, worked very hard on this article. It is very well written and comes complete with plenty of pictures.
- Edofenrir (talk)
- Fuzzipede27 (talk)
- MrConcreteDonkey (talk)
- Toadwell (talk)
- Baby Mario Bloops (talk)
- New Super Mario (talk)
Oppose
Removal of Opposes
Comments
My only problem with the article is that some parts seem to be written in future tense (use the word "will"). It should all be in present tense. Fawfulfury65 (talk)
- Done. The article had a few imperatives, too many badly written sentences, and way too many pronoun disagreement. Fortunately, they are gone. LeftyGreenMario (talk)
- I don't really think you "fixed" pronoun agreement. Some people may think that the former pronoun-antecedent is correct. Plus, "he or she" is super rambly. I suggest you either revise it to make "player" to "players" or changing "player" to "Mario/Luigi, Mario or Luigi" so we don't get to this type of argument. BabyLuigiOnFire (talk)
