Talk:Porcupo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I think the sprite should be removed.It's not really usefull. | I think the sprite should be removed.It's not really usefull. | ||
[[User:Gofer|Gofer]] | [[User:Gofer|Gofer]] | ||
Shut up Max.{{User:Fg/sig}} | |||
WHAT?!?!?! {{User:Maxlover2/sig}} | |||
Great, another Fg VS all image battle. If the article were to be longer, I'd side with Fg. But since it's so short, I'm sideing with everyone else.--{{User:Aipom/sig}}-- | |||
But its here and its cool. Someone took time (and energy) to draw it, someone took time to upload it. FG, consider yourself warn'd for malicious behavior.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
Sorry my temper was uncontrolled.But do you accept my apology?{{User:Fg/sig}} | |||
I think it should stay.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
Guys. Let the argument die. The image stays, its cool.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
There. Longer page, more images.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
==Plural== | |||
Porcupi makes more sense to me, I don't think there's an e, though.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
Porcupos is the most official term. {{User:Maxlover2/sig}} | |||
Too bad it isn't aesthetics for the toungue.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
I mean, It's best to keep the word the same, rather than changing it (as you suggested) {{User:Maxlover2/sig}} Maybe the plural is Porcupo? (Like, 1 Deer, 2 Deer, 1 Kirby, 2 Kirby, 1 Fish, 2 Fish (red fish, blue fish. LOL)) {{User:Maxlover2/sig}} | |||
Lol. Yeah. Porcupo sounds good.{{User:HK-47/sig}} | |||
let's try...<br> | |||
1 Porcupo<br> | |||
2 Porcopo<br> | |||
Sounds good. {{User:Maxlover2/sig}} | |||
== Sonic Reference? == | |||
I just noticed how the Porcupo in the DiC cartoons looks a lot like their interpretation of Sonic (they also did his cartoon), but just different enough. Weird, probably not worthy of inclusion, huh? {{User:Stumpers/sig}} 03:51, 10 March 2008 (EDT) | |||
: It predated Sonic, so it's a coincidence. [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] 12:02, 28 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Image verification? == | |||
So, is that art new? The image in the article is purple, but my NES manual shows a completely different picture. For one thing, it's black in the NES manual. That, and article's image looks newer. Where does this design come from? Super Mario Advance? I wasn't aware the art was updated. Can someone verify if this is an official image? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] 12:04, 28 August 2009 (EDT) | |||
== Mario Kart == | |||
Shouldn't it have gotten a proposal before being put into effect? Not that it bothers me, or anything, but... I mean... It would actually have brought up more consensus. --{{User:FanOfYoshi/sig}} 08:21, December 16, 2020 (EST) | |||
:There was a brief [[Special:Diff/3037011|discussion]] but it seemed too clear-cut for a proposal. Are there any objections? [[User:LinkTheLefty|LinkTheLefty]] ([[User talk:LinkTheLefty|talk]]) 08:32, December 16, 2020 (EST) | |||
== Manual image == | |||
I noticed that the sprite shown in the Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic manual shows Porcupo differently than it is seen in-game. Could that sprite have been from the prototype of said game? [[User:Thejohnston7|Thejohnston7]] ([[User talk:Thejohnston7|talk]]) | |||
:I do see feet on it. I've added that note to the article. [[User:Doc von Schmeltwick|Doc von Schmeltwick]] ([[User talk:Doc von Schmeltwick|talk]]) 20:59, May 7, 2024 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 19:59, May 7, 2024
Tch, just let the art stay, guys.SaudyTalk!
It's Fg. he's so picky!!! Max2 (talk) Geez, Fg, this Isn't an ART GALLERY. It's a WIKI.
I think the sprite should be removed.It's not really usefull. Gofer
Great, another Fg VS all image battle. If the article were to be longer, I'd side with Fg. But since it's so short, I'm sideing with everyone else.-- Aipom --
But its here and its cool. Someone took time (and energy) to draw it, someone took time to upload it. FG, consider yourself warn'd for malicious behavior.SaudyTalk!
Sorry my temper was uncontrolled.But do you accept my apology?F g
I think it should stay.SaudyTalk!
Guys. Let the argument die. The image stays, its cool.SaudyTalk!
There. Longer page, more images.SaudyTalk!
Plural[edit]
Porcupi makes more sense to me, I don't think there's an e, though.SaudyTalk!
Porcupos is the most official term. Max2 (talk)
Too bad it isn't aesthetics for the toungue.SaudyTalk!
I mean, It's best to keep the word the same, rather than changing it (as you suggested) Max2 (talk) Maybe the plural is Porcupo? (Like, 1 Deer, 2 Deer, 1 Kirby, 2 Kirby, 1 Fish, 2 Fish (red fish, blue fish. LOL)) Max2 (talk)
Lol. Yeah. Porcupo sounds good.SaudyTalk!
let's try...
1 Porcupo
2 Porcopo
Sounds good. Max2 (talk)
Sonic Reference?[edit]
I just noticed how the Porcupo in the DiC cartoons looks a lot like their interpretation of Sonic (they also did his cartoon), but just different enough. Weird, probably not worthy of inclusion, huh? Stumpers! 03:51, 10 March 2008 (EDT)
- It predated Sonic, so it's a coincidence. LinkTheLefty 12:02, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
Image verification?[edit]
So, is that art new? The image in the article is purple, but my NES manual shows a completely different picture. For one thing, it's black in the NES manual. That, and article's image looks newer. Where does this design come from? Super Mario Advance? I wasn't aware the art was updated. Can someone verify if this is an official image? LinkTheLefty 12:04, 28 August 2009 (EDT)
Mario Kart[edit]
Shouldn't it have gotten a proposal before being put into effect? Not that it bothers me, or anything, but... I mean... It would actually have brought up more consensus. -- FanOfYoshi 08:21, December 16, 2020 (EST)
- There was a brief discussion but it seemed too clear-cut for a proposal. Are there any objections? LinkTheLefty (talk) 08:32, December 16, 2020 (EST)
Manual image[edit]
I noticed that the sprite shown in the Yume Kōjō: Doki Doki Panic manual shows Porcupo differently than it is seen in-game. Could that sprite have been from the prototype of said game? Thejohnston7 (talk)
- I do see feet on it. I've added that note to the article. Doc von Schmeltwick (talk) 20:59, May 7, 2024 (EDT)