MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Lakitu: Difference between revisions
From the Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
mNo edit summary |
m (Shokora moved page MarioWiki:Featured articles/N1/Lakitu to MarioWiki:Featured articles/N2/Lakitu without leaving a redirect: requested) |
||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ===[[{{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}||3}}]]=== | ||
{{ | {{FANOMFAIL | ||
|nominated= | |nominated=22:40, 9 November 2012 | ||
| | |lastedit=23:40, 8 January 2013 | ||
|nosupport=true | |||
}} | }} | ||
==== Support ==== | ==== Support ==== | ||
#{{User|Mariobros1985}} I have nominated this article for refeaturing for many reasons. First, I made sure that there were no red links. Second, I double checked for spelling errors and made sure there were no boxes requesting that the article should be fixed. This article meets all requirements for featuring and is a perfect article to be featured. | #{{User|Mariobros1985}} I have nominated this article for refeaturing for many reasons. First, I made sure that there were no red links. Second, I double checked for spelling errors and made sure there were no boxes requesting that the article should be fixed. This article meets all requirements for featuring and is a perfect article to be featured. | ||
#{{User|Electrical Bowser jr.}} | |||
#{{User|SmartYoshi}} | |||
==== Oppose ==== | ==== Oppose ==== | ||
#{{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} to many short section such as the Super-Mario-Kun section reading that section didn't inform me of there specific role | |||
#{{User|Daisyluva99}} A number of sections are short, and I am disappionted about this | |||
#{{User|SuperYoshiBros}} Short sections, missing information (ex. Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix) | |||
==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ==== Removal of Opposes ==== | ||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
{{User|Mariobros1985}} Notes: I have changed the red link "Blooming Lakitus" so that it is now bold and does not appear as a red link. | {{User|Mariobros1985}} Notes: I have changed the red link "Blooming Lakitus" so that it is now bold and does not appear as a red link. *Update* As of 11/26/12, Lakitu is being supported 3-0, so I don't see how this could be considered a FA failure. 12/2/12 Update: I don't understand how the Super Mario-Kun section is insufficient; first of all, I looked it up and Lakitu never has a major role. Second, the article already states that Lakitu appears as an enemy in some of the issues, and a referee in others. | ||
:I'm sorry what issues does Lakitu appear in? how does it act as an enemy? these are questions that the article does not answer. {{User|Marshal Dan Troop}} | |||
{{user|Meester Tweester}} Very informative, but too many red links in the [[New Super Mario Bros. U]] section. I'm undecided. | |||
{{User|Mariobros1985}} The red links have been fixed now. | |||
Still too many short sections. This really needs to be fixed. {{User|Daisyluva99}} | |||
Latest revision as of 21:22, February 20, 2017
Lakitu[edit]
Support[edit]
- Mariobros1985 (talk) I have nominated this article for refeaturing for many reasons. First, I made sure that there were no red links. Second, I double checked for spelling errors and made sure there were no boxes requesting that the article should be fixed. This article meets all requirements for featuring and is a perfect article to be featured.
- Electrical Bowser jr. (talk)
- SmartYoshi (talk)
Oppose[edit]
- Marshal Dan Troop (talk) to many short section such as the Super-Mario-Kun section reading that section didn't inform me of there specific role
- Daisyluva99 (talk) A number of sections are short, and I am disappionted about this
- SuperYoshiBros (talk) Short sections, missing information (ex. Dance Dance Revolution Mario Mix)
Removal of Opposes[edit]
Comments[edit]
Mariobros1985 (talk) Notes: I have changed the red link "Blooming Lakitus" so that it is now bold and does not appear as a red link. *Update* As of 11/26/12, Lakitu is being supported 3-0, so I don't see how this could be considered a FA failure. 12/2/12 Update: I don't understand how the Super Mario-Kun section is insufficient; first of all, I looked it up and Lakitu never has a major role. Second, the article already states that Lakitu appears as an enemy in some of the issues, and a referee in others.
- I'm sorry what issues does Lakitu appear in? how does it act as an enemy? these are questions that the article does not answer. Marshal Dan Troop (talk)
Meester Tweester (talk) Very informative, but too many red links in the New Super Mario Bros. U section. I'm undecided. Mariobros1985 (talk) The red links have been fixed now.
Still too many short sections. This really needs to be fixed. Daisyluva99 (talk)
